You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

GM to add more steel to Volt to protect battery

Will add steel to battery plates

Mark Blinch/Reuters/File

General Motors Co said yesterday that it has developed a proposed fix to the battery pack for the Chevrolet Volt to eliminate the risk of a fire being triggered days after a crash.

DETROIT - General Motors is advising Volt owners to return their electric cars to dealers for repairs that will lower the risk of battery fires.

The company hopes the repairs, which will add steel to the plates protecting the batteries, will ease worries about the car’s safety. Three Volt batteries caught fire after government crash-tests last year, prompting an investigation and sending GM engineers scrambling to find a fix.

Continue reading below

The free repairs, announced yesterday, will fix 8,000 Volts on US roads and another 4,400 still for sale. The cars are covered by a “customer service campaign’’ run by GM, which is similar to a safety recall but allows the carmaker to avoid the bad publicity and federal monitoring that come with a recall.

GM and federal safety officials believe last year’s fires were caused by coolant leaking from damaged plastic casing around the batteries after side-impact collisions. That coolant caused an electrical short, which sparked battery fires seven days to three weeks after the crashes.

GM has a huge incentive to fix the problem and protect the Volt’s image. Although the car isn’t yet a big seller, it burnishes GM’s image as a greener, more innovative auto maker.

The safety stumble could make it even harder for the Chevrolet Volt to compete with rival electric cars such as the Nissan Leaf. To contain the bad publicity after the fires, GM last year offered to buy back Volts from worried owners. Still, no owners have reported fires after crashes.

Starting in February, dealers will add steel to a plate that protects the Volt battery, spreading the force of a crash over a larger area, said Mary Barra, GM’s product development chief. Tests by GM and the government have shown that the repair prevents battery damage and coolant leaks.

“We have made the Volt even safer,’’ said Mark Reuss, GM’s North American president.

GM has done crash tests on four reinforced Volts and found that the fix worked. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - the federal safety agency - has also crashed a Volt with the added steel. “The preliminary results of the crash test indicate the remedy proposed by General Motors today should address the issue,’’ the agency said.

It will monitor the crashed car for another week as it continues its investigation.

Critics of the federal safety agency have accused it of going easy on GM because the government still owns a 26.5 percent stake in the company and because the Obama administration has urged more sales of electric cars to end US dependence on foreign oil.

Lynda Tran, spokeswoman for the federal safety agency, would not comment on the criticism.

GM nearly ran out of cash and needed a $49.5 billion government bailout to survive bankruptcy protection in 2009. The government took a stake in the company in exchange for the aid.

GM sold 7,671 Volts last year, falling short of its goal of 10,000. It was outsold by its main competitor, the Leaf, at 9,674. The Volt had its best month ever in December with 1,529 sales, but a GM executive conceded yesterday that the battery fires may have affected sales.

“There has been some uncertainty in the market,’’ says Alan Batey, vice president of GM’s Chevrolet division. “We do believe that uncertainty will go away.’’

News of the fix helped GM stock. Shares rose $1.02, or nearly 5 percent, to close at $22.17.

The Volt has a T-shaped, 400-pound battery pack that can power the car for about 35 miles. After that, a small gasoline generator kicks in to run the electric motor. The car has a base price of about $40,000.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration began studying the Volt batteries after a test car caught fire in June at a facility in Wisconsin. The fire broke out three weeks after a side-impact crash test.

At first, GM blamed the agency for the June fire, saying it should have drained the battery to prevent any fires after the test. The company quickly retreated and said it never told the agency to drain the battery. GM executives also said there was no formal procedure in place to drain batteries after crashes involving owners.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week