Read as much as you want on BostonGlobe.com, anywhere and anytime, for just 99¢.

Inspector general cites flaws in Treasury foreclosure aid program

WASHINGTON - The Treasury Department rushed out a major revamp of its foreclosure prevention program in 2010, limiting the plan’s ability to help people who are unemployed or owe more than their homes are worth, a government watchdog says.

Treasury’s Hardest Hit Fund, which distributes money to state housing agencies for a range of programs, has been plagued by delays and disagreements with mortgage companies that must participate for the program to succeed, according to a report released Thursday by the special inspector general for the financial bailouts.

Continue reading below

“Treasury’s failure to set meaningful goals for the program leaves the agency vulnerable to criticism that it’s trying to avoid accountability,’’ said Christy Romero, special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, in a statement.

The Hardest Hit Fund is part of the broader financial bailout known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, a $700 billion bailout package approved at the peak of the 2008 financial crisis.

The fund was created to fix weaknesses in Treasury’s earlier effort to prevent foreclosures. Critics had said the original program did not help unemployed people or people who owed more than their homes were worth.

Money from the Hardest Hit Fund is distributed to state housing agencies, which run a variety of aid programs for homeowners. The special inspector general’s report says it has distributed only $217.4 million - about 3 percent of the money set aside for the fund.

Of the money that was distributed, nearly all went to assist people who were unemployed and late on their mortgages. Almost none went to people who are “underwater’’ because their homes lost value after they took out big loans.

Unless it is overhauled, the program is likely to have limited impact on those homeowners, the report says.

The program was hindered from the start by Treasury’s failure to gain support from the government-controlled mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the report says. Many big, private mortgage companies initially refused to participate because they wanted guidance from Fannie and Freddie, it says. The companies, called mortgage servicers, collect people’s monthly payments and foreclose when they fall behind.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com