You can now read 10 articles a month for free. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

Retailers’ worries delay calorie count label rules

FDA hears fears of expense, inconvenience

This sandwich board at a Panera store displays the calorie count for each item, but many other restaurants and food retailers say that doing so would be too difficult for them.

Charles Krupa/AP/File

This sandwich board at a Panera store displays the calorie count for each item, but many other restaurants and food retailers say that doing so would be too difficult for them.

WASHINGTON — Diners will have to wait a little longer to find calorie counts on most restaurant chain menus, in supermarkets, and on vending machines.

Writing a new menu labeling law ‘‘has gotten extremely thorny,’’ said the head of the Food and Drug Administration, Margaret Hamburg, as the agency tries to figure out who should be covered by it.

Continue reading below

The 2010 health care law charged the FDA with requiring restaurants and other establishments that serve food to put calorie counts on menus and in vending machines. The agency issued a proposed rule in 2011, but the final rules have been delayed as some of those nonrestaurant establishments have lobbied hard to be exempt.

While the restaurant industry has signed on to the idea and helped to write the regulations, supermarkets, convenience stores, and other retailers that sell prepared food say they want to no part of it.

‘‘There are very, very strong opinions and powerful voices both on the consumer and public health side and on the industry side, and we have worked very hard to sort of figure out what really makes sense and also what is implementable,’’ Hamburg said in a recent interview.

Hamburg said menu labeling has turned out to be one of the FDA’s most challenging issues, and while requiring calorie counts in some establishments might make sense on paper, ‘‘in practice it really would be very hard.’’ She did not say what specific types of establishments she was referring to.

Hamburg said the FDA is in the final stages of writing the menu labeling regulations and the final rules should come out in the ‘‘relative near term.’’ The FDA has tentatively said the rules are due this spring, but that deadline may be optimistic, as the food industry and regulators continue to haggle over how they will be written.

The 2011 proposed rules would require chain restaurants with 20 or more locations, along with bakeries, grocery stores, convenience stores, and coffee chains, to clearly post the calorie count for each item on their menus. Additional nutritional information would have to be available upon request. The rules would also­ apply to vending machines if calorie information isn’t already visible on the package.

The proposed rules exempted movie theaters, airplanes, bowling alleys, and other businesses whose primary business is not to sell food. Alcohol would also be exempted.

Supermarkets and convenience stores are looking for similar exemptions in the final rules. Representatives for the supermarket industry say it could cost them up to a billion dollars to put the rules in place — costs that would be passed on to consumers.

‘‘It’s a huge problem for us,’’ said Erik Lieberman of the Food Marketing Institute, which represents retail grocery chains. He said fighting the menu labeling rules is one of his group’s top priorities.

Lieberman said the rules could cover thousands of items in each store, going beyond just the prepared foods case and extending to cut fruit, bakery items like pies and loaves of bread, and other store items that aren’t already packaged and labeled.

Lieberman said that means each store has to send all of those items out to labs to be tested, do paperwork to justify the ingredient and nutritional information for each item to the FDA, and then create signs and train employees.

Convenience stores say they will have similar problems.

‘‘In a small store like a convenience store that is really putting a lot of signage all over the place,’’ said Jeff Lenard of the National Association of Convenience Stores, referring to the calorie labels. ‘‘You just hit a point where words become noise, and that’s not good.’’

Nutrition lobbyist Margo Wootan of the Center for Science in the Public Interest said consumer advocates heard the same kind of complaining from the packaged foods industry before it was required to put nutrition information on the backs of food items. Supermarkets and convenience stores should be included because they are breaking more and more into the prepared foods business, she said.

The idea of menu labeling is to make sure that customers process the calorie information as they are figuring out what to eat. Many restaurants currently post nutritional information in a hallway, on a hamburger wrapper, or on a website. The new law will make calories immediately available for most items.

The labeling requirements were added to the health bill with the support of the restaurant industry, which has faced a patchwork of laws from cities and states. New York City was the first in the country to put a calorie posting law in place. Since then, other cities and states have followed.

Scott DeFife of the National Restaurant Association said the supermarkets are exaggerating how much it would cost them to implement the rules. The restaurant industry has lobbied for the prepared foods in supermarkets and convenience stores to be included, saying they are selling essentially the same things.

DeFife said some convenience stores have even joined the National Restaurant Association, as many gas stations now include restaurants in their stores.

‘‘It’s about the food, not the format,’’ he said.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week