WASHINGTON — The government’s oversight of hundreds of domestic and overseas repair stations that service US airliners is ineffective and doesn’t target the factors most likely to present safety risks, the Department of Transportation’s inspector general said Monday.
The Federal Aviation Administration’s supposedly risk-based safety inspection system ‘‘falls short of being truly risk-based,’’ especially for foreign repair stations, a report by the inspector general said. Among the inspector general’s criticisms is that the FAA’s oversight lacks the rigor needed to identify safety deficiencies and verify that problems are corrected once identified.
To save money, US airlines have increasingly outsourced their aircraft repair and maintenance to repair stations in countries where labor rates are cheaper. The FAA annually inspects 559 repair stations worldwide, while aviation authorities in France, Germany, and Ireland inspect another 162 stations under agreements with the United States.
Auditors from the inspector general’s office visited or contacted FAA inspection offices and 27 aircraft repair stations in the United States, Brazil, China, New Zealand, Peru, and Singapore.
‘‘The FAA’s ability to conduct effective and consistent inspections of foreign and domestic repair stations is hindered by a lack of standardized inspection processes,’’ the report said.
Inspectors don’t use a standardized checklist for conducting inspections, don’t enter complete information on their inspections into FAA’s inspection database, and don’t effectively communicate the results of their inspections with repair station officials afterwards, the report said. Inspectors were often vague about the problems they found, citing the safety regulation that was violated without explaining what specifically the facility was doing that violated the regulation.
‘‘Officials from one foreign repair station were so frustrated by poor communication with its inspectors that they decided it was easier and more efficient to fly to the United States to meet with FAA for clarification and guidance,’’ the report said.
The supposedly risk-based inspection system ‘falls short of being truly risk-based.’
In another case cited in the report, officials for a repair station told auditors they didn’t hurry to address oversights because the FAA inspector wrote out the requested changes by hand instead of typing, therefore they assumed the changes weren’t significant.