You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

Hide processor to resolve wage suit for nearly $1m

Chelsea plant denies fault, wants to move on

A Chelsea animal hide processing plant must pay nearly $1 million to resolve a lawsuit involving underpaid workers, according to a federal court agreement approved last week.

Boston Hides & Furs Ltd. will pay $825,000 in back wages and damages to 14 workers who, the suit says, earned about $300 for working 60 hours a week processing hides and furs to be shipped to tanneries. The company also has to pay $100,000 in damages to 10 workers who were allegedly fired for assisting in the investigation, and $50,000 in civil penalties to the US Department of Labor.

Continue reading below

The lawsuit alleges that when Labor Department investigators went to Boston Hides & Furs in May 2012, the company hid workers in a house nearby for several hours and fired them when they talked to investigators a week later.

The back wages cover a four-year period, which is a longer time frame than most wage-and-hour cases because of the mistreatment the employees endured, said Audrey Richardson, an attorney with Greater Boston Legal Services, which worked with the community organizing group Chelsea Collaborative to support the employees, gather evidence, and assist with the federal investigation and litigation. Not only were the workers underpaid for “backbreaking work,” Richardson said, they were threatened, insulted, and humiliated.

“Other employers who think they could similarly profit from this kind of exploitation and abuse should take note of the serious consequences that Boston Hides has faced,” she said.

Boston Hides & Furs denies all wrongdoing, lawyer Gary Feldman wrote in an e-mail. The settlement in US District Court in Boston was reached so the company could “move forward with its business, continuing to be a source of good employment for many families in the Chelsea community,” he said.

“If the case proceeded through discovery and trial, Boston Hides would have demonstrated that the amount of hours the [Department of Labor] claimed was grossly inflated,” Feldman said. “Boston Hides also would have proved that it did not fire the workers or retaliate in any way. To the contrary, each of the individuals stopped coming to work after the federal government showed up at the workplace.”

‘Other employers who think they could similarly profit . . . should take note.’

Quote Icon

According to the agreement, Boston Hides & Furs could be found in contempt of court if it sells a hide handled by an employee who was not properly paid.

Katie Johnston can be reached at Follow her on Twitter @ktkjohnston.
Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of