Court considers ending Stanford Ponzi scheme suits

R. Allen Stanford at the Bob Casey Federal Courthouse in Houston in March 2012.

Houston Chronicle via AP

R. Allen Stanford at the Bob Casey Federal Courthouse in Houston in March 2012.

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday debated whether to allow continued class-action lawsuits from investors who lost billions in former Texas tycoon R. Allen Stanford’s massive Ponzi scheme.

Justices listened to lawyers argue over whether lawsuits should proceed against individuals, law firms, and investment companies that allegedly aided Stanford’s fraud.


Stanford was sent to prison for 110 years after being convicted of what prosecutors termed a $7.2 billion Ponzi scheme on investors. The fraud stemmed from the sale of certificates of deposits from the Stanford International Bank that supposedly were backed by safe investments. But those investments did not exist.

At issue before the court is whether the federal Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, a federal law aimed at limiting private lawsuits that allege securities fraud, can be used to block the suits investors filed in Louisiana and Texas.

Justices will make a ruling sometime next year.

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of