You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

The Boston Globe

Business

Beware, study says, money is addictive

The more that people earned, the more they said money mattered to them.

Reuters/File

The more that people earned, the more they said money mattered to them.

WASHINGTON — There is a fundamental principle in economics that applies to food, clothing, and even all of those shiny tech gadgets that start with the letter ‘‘i’’: The more of them we have, the less we value them.

But that may not be true when it comes to money.

Continue reading below

New research from Jeffrey Pfeffer, a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Business, and his colleagues at the University of Toronto and Renmin University of China finds that the more money people make, the more they value it.

The research, published in the journal ILRReview, examined data from a longitudinal survey known as the British Household Panel Survey, as well the results from new experiments.

Pfeffer and his colleagues calculated respondents’ hourly income, as well as its growth over time, to separate money earned by actual work and money earned from other sources, such as investments. It then compared hourly earnings to respondents’ views on how important it was to them to ‘‘have a lot of money.’’

‘‘We thought it was quite possible that money was different because of its symbolic nature — when I pay you, I’m also signaling your worth,’’ Pfeffer said.

And that is what they found. The more that people earned, the more they said money mattered to them. The same correlation was not true when it came to money made from sources unrelated to work. That kind of income, Pfeffer said, has ‘‘much less implication for one’s sense of mastery or worth.’’

Pfeffer said the research provides implications for how chief executives and other workers are paid. When it comes to motivating employees, he thinks it is a reminder for managers to emphasize — instead of money — the organization’s mission. He recalls the story of a human resource executive who spoke to his Stanford class about how his software company did not give stock options, an idea that sounded like sacrilege in Silicon Valley. ‘‘He said, ‘Look, a raise is only a raise for 30 days. After that, it’s a salary.’ ’’

Money, Pfeffer said, is like an addictive substance. It raises the bar and leaves people always wanting more. Leaders who focus on money as a reward, Pfeffer said, ‘‘are going to have to give more and more of it to have any motivational effect. You’re getting people on some kind of treadmill.’’

When asked what his research tells us about how to get outsized CEO pay under control, Pfeffer referenced an answer he has provided in the past: Tax it at a higher rate, just like any other addictive substance.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week