NEW YORK — A crush it isn’t.
Wall Street is giving King Digital, the company behind the popular mobile game ‘‘Candy Crush Saga,’’ the cold shoulder in its public trading debut.
King’s stock priced at $22.50 on Tuesday, valuing the company at $7.1 billion. But it opened on Wednesday at $20.50, down almost 9 percent. Its shares lost more ground by the day’s close, falling more than 15 percent.
King Digital Entertainment PLC had $1.88 billion in revenue last year. That’s more than 10 times its 2012 revenue of $164.4 million.
But some analysts have questioned whether King would be able to repeat the success of ‘‘Candy Crush,’’ which has been far more successful than any of its other games. Its other top games include ‘‘Pet Rescue Saga’’ and ‘‘Farm Heroes Saga.’’
‘‘It’s a one-hit-wonder,’’ said Francis Gaskins, director of research for Equities.com and president of IPOdesktop.com. ‘‘The history of game companies is that none of them can prove that they can consistently introduce new products to grow revenue. They say they can, but they can’t.’’
‘‘Candy Crush’’ has been immensely popular but Gaskins said it is a maturing product that consumers are growing tired of. He pointed to a slowdown in revenue and profit between its last two quarters as an indicator. Its current quarter wraps up Monday and he thinks investors may be anticipating another dip in revenue. He suggested the company may have fared better if it had gone public in September at its peak.
King’s debut has drawn comparisons to another game maker, Zynga Inc. Zynga had a ballyhooed IPO in late 2011, but the company faltered after having trouble transitioning into a mobile company from one whose games were played mostly on a desktop computer.
Ricardo Zacconi, King’s cofounder and chief executive, told CNBC Wednesday that the company is ‘‘not just a one-hit wonder’’ and pointed out that it has three games in the top 10 on Facebook.
King may also be faring better than other high-profile IPOs when it comes to its financial health. Rapid Ratings, which analyzes companies’ financial efficiency, gave the company an 86 on a scale of 0 to 100.