To continue getting breaking news and the full stories from The Boston Globe, subscribe today.

The Boston Globe

Ideas

Ideas

Should we put robots on trial?

As machines get smarter — and sometimes cause harm — we’re going to need a legal system that can handle them.

Imagine being hit by a car with no driver. The guy in the passenger seat shrugs and points innocently at the computer nested in his dashboard. Who is to blame? You realize you have no idea.

To its advocates, the self-driving car currently under development by Google and other companies will be a godsend—a vehicle equipped with cameras, sensors, and a powerful CPU that will take thousands of life-or-death decisions out of the hands of fallible, distracted humans. But from a legal perspective, it raises an immediate question: What if the car screws up? What if it runs someone over?

Comments

Interesting article. Whoever creates the robot must incorporate Asimov's Laws
( A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
A robot must obey the orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Laws.)

and having done so, then the creator is liable for any damage.

QED, as they say in law school.