fb-pixelPharmacy linked to meningitis outbreak broke rules, Patrick says - The Boston Globe Skip to main content

Pharmacy linked to meningitis outbreak broke rules, Patrick says

PUBLIC HEALTH WATCHDOG: Dr. Madeleine Biondolillo said new rules were issued out of “an abundance of caution.”Bill Greene/Globe Staff

Governor Deval Patrick Wednesday accused the Massachusetts pharmacy linked to an outbreak of fungal meningitis, which has sickened at least 137 people nationwide and killed 12, of misleading regulators and operating outside its ­license by shipping large batches of drugs across the country.

To ensure no others might be breaking the rules, the Board of Registration in Pharmacy took the extraordinary step of ordering all compounding pharmacies in Massachusetts to sign affidavits swearing they are complying with state regulations prohibiting compounders from mass-producing medications.

"What they were supposed to be doing is filling specific prescriptions for specific ­patients as I think any of us would understand a pharmacy to do,'' said Patrick, referring to New England Compounding Center, the Framingham company whose injectable steroids are at the center of the outbreak. "What they were doing instead is making big batches and selling out of state as a manufacturer would, and that is certainly outside their state ­license.

"It does seem like the agencies both at the state and the federal level may have been misled by some of the information we were given,'' the governor told reporters.

Advertisement



In fact, several physicians who received shipments of the possibly contaminated steroids from New England Compounding said in interviews Wednesday that they did not provide the company with patient prescriptions to obtain the drugs, as state regulations require.

The investigation of the outbreak expanded Wednesday, as public health officials made clear they are looking deeply ­into businesses owned by the same families that own New England Compounding.

Two related companies — Ameridose of Westborough and its distributor, Alaunus Pharmaceutical — voluntarily agreed to temporarily cease all manufacturing and compounding operations immediately amid the investigation by ­Massachusetts and the US Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

New England Compounding has shut down operations and recalled all its drugs, including three lots of methylprednisolone acetate the firm shipped to providers in 23 states. The CDC has said 13,000 patients received injections of the painkiller for lower back pain. Federal officials believe those lots may have been contaminated with at least two different types of fungus, which infected patients, traveling from the injection site near the spine to the brain, causing a ­serious and rare form of meningitis.

Advertisement



The Globe reported Wednesday that Ameridose, a company ­licensed and regulated by federal authorities to manufacture medications on a large scale, shares the same owners as New England Compounding. Ameridose said it provides services to more than 3,000 hospitals nation­wide.

Dr. Madeleine Biondolillo, director of the state Public Health Department's Bureau of Healthcare Safety, said that officials have not seen any evidence of "products compromised" at Ameridose but that the company stopped production to give investigators time to do a comprehensive review of its operations, including the companies' corporate structure.

State health officials have not "requested a recall at this time" of any Ameridose products, and she stressed the agreement to cease operations is voluntary.

Biondolillo said the affidavit requirement for all compounding pharmacies was "issued purely out of an abundance of caution, consistent with our commitment to keeping the public safe." She said she does not believe "others are operating outside the law."

Compounding pharmacies are supposed to mix hard-to-find medications for doctors and their patients who have ­allergies, difficulty swallowing, or otherwise cannot take mass-produced drugs. They are not subject to the same manufacturing safety rules and drug pre-approval requirements as manufacturers, which are regulated by the FDA.

Advertisement



According to doctors at some, but not all, of the 75 clinics who received shipments of the possibly tainted steroid, New England Compounding did not require prescriptions for individual patients.

Dr. Francis Agbonkpolo, owner of Obosa Medical Services in Mount Vernon, N.Y., said he ordered steroids from the company this summer because the drug was on back order from his usual suppliers. He said he picked up the company's contact information at one of the many pain management conferences he attends. He had used four of the 25 vials the company sent him in July, when he received his regular shipment and shelved the remain­ing bottles, he said.

Agbonkpolo said he had ­received the medications from the Framingham company as "a bulk order" and that he had not supplied the company with ­individual prescriptions

At Dr. O'Connell's Pain Management Center, which has ­offices in Merrimack and ­Somersworth, N.H., Dr. ­Michael O'Connell said New England Compounding did not require him to provide prescriptions either, a practice he said is not uncommon in the compounding industry.

"The whole idea of requiring prescriptions is very difficult,'' he said. "You write a prescription for a particular patient and they're a no show or they cancel. Do you send it back? It made it very awkward the very few times we did that in the past. I have no clue how that would add to the safety of the medication. It's either safe and sterile, or it's not.''

Advertisement



"We are doing the best we can to get a product to a patient who is in pain,'' he said.

O'Connell said he bought ­injectable steroids from New England Compounding rather than a large drug maker because their products are about 25 percent cheaper and preservative-free. Doctors fear alcohol, a common preservative, could damage patients' nerves.

The Pain Management Center injected 212 patients with the potentially tainted product and about half a dozen so far have suspicious symptoms and are being treated in the hospital, he said.

New England Compounding was accused of overstepping its bounds as long ago as 2003. At that time, David Marsh, a pharmacist who worked as a researcher for Alcon, a pharmaceutical company, was attending a scientific conference when a colleague handed him an adver­tising brochure from New England Compounding.

It said that it had exhibited at a meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology in October 2002 and that there "was considerable interest'' in the use of a particular injectable drug to treat eye disease. "We want you to know that we can compound this medication for you on a prescription basis,'' said the brochure signed by staff pharmacist Lisa Conigliaro Cadden.

Marsh wrote a letter of complaint to the Massachusetts pharmacy board warning that the company was putting ­patients at risk because such ­injections were not FDA-
approved and could cause sight-threatening infections.

Advertisement



Marsh was unsure what the board did in response, but public health officials previously said the board investigated a 2002 complaint about New England Compounding.


Liz Kowalczyk can be reached at kowalczyk@globe.com. Kay Lazar can be reached at
klazar@globe.com
.