Read as much as you want on BostonGlobe.com, anywhere and anytime, for just 99¢.

Celtics Live

84

100

Final

Bruins Live

1

1

2nd Prd 8:00

Patriots Live

17

16

Final

MD MAMA

Should food stamps pay for empty calories?

Adapted from the MD Mama blog on Boston.com.

We don’t have to buy healthy foods if we don’t want to. We can go to the store and fill our cart with soda and chips if we feel like it. But should the government have to pay for our bad choices?

No, says a commentary in the Journal of the American Medical Association by Dr. David Ludwig, head of the New Balance Foundation Obesity Prevention Center at Boston Children’s Hospital, along with doctors Susan Blumenthal and Walter Willett. They point out that the highest rates of obesity are found in people with the lowest incomes. And the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, is part of the problem.

Continue reading below

When it comes to fighting hunger, it’s not just about getting enough calories — getting good calories matters. Not all calories are created equal; some simply offer better nutrition, and keep us full longer. As the authors write:

“Research suggests that if a child consumes 20 oz (600 mL) of a sugary drink, she will become hungrier more quickly than if she ate a large apple and a heaping tablespoon of peanut butter, even though both have about the same number of calories. Thus, the present lack of focus on food quality in SNAP may simultaneously exacerbate hunger and promote obesity.’’

See, you can buy any food or beverage you want with food stamps — except alcohol, tobacco, vitamins, or hot prepared items. You truly could fill your shopping cart with soda and chips.

Now, I am all for personal choice. Being poor is hard enough without the government telling you what you can and can’t eat, right? Right . . . except that empty calories can leave you hungry, and the point of SNAP is to fight hunger. Actually, empty calories make you not just hungry but fat. And if the government is going to be paying for your health care, I think it’s fair that it has some say in your diet.

It’s not like there isn’t precedent for regulating what foods the government pays for. The WIC program (Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children) only pays for a defined and healthy food package, and in 2010, legislation was passed to improve the quality of school meals.

I was surprised to read in the commentary that half of the population will be enrolled in SNAP at some time by age 19. As a pediatrician, that really makes me want the program to only cover healthy foods. It’s one thing if you’re a grown-up making bad choices for yourself. It’s another to make bad choices for kids — choices that could doom them to lifelong poor health.

The government also needs to fix agricultural subsidies, which are also contributing to our obesity epidemic. Taxpayer money should go toward making us healthy, not unhealthy. It’s that simple.

Read this blog at Boston.com/MDMama.
Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com