Health & wellness

Daily Dose

Should infertility treatments for fertile gay or single women be covered?

Should infertility treatments for fertile gay or single women be covered?

Should women be denied coverage for infertility treatments if they’re fertile but have no partner to mate with because they’re single or gay? A proposal to do just that was published in a well-respected medical journal, pitched by a doctoral student in theological ethics at Boston College.

Cristina Richie, author of the provocative paper published Thursday in the Journal of Medical Ethics, told me she has no religious objections to infertility treatments such as artificial insemination or in vitro fertilization. Her motivation is to start what she calls a “green bioethics movement” to reduce the carbon footprint caused by elective medical procedures.

Advertisement

“Hormones used in these treatments have environmental side effects when they get into the water supply and the retrieval of eggs and storage of embryos is a carbon intensive procedure,” Richie said. “Children conceived from these procedures also leave a carbon legacy.”

Thus, she reasoned, mandated insurance coverage for infertility treatments — as in Massachusetts — should not apply to fertile women. Excluding them from this coverage might encourage them to adopt instead.

Get The Weekender in your inbox:
The Globe's top picks for what to see and do each weekend, in Boston and beyond.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

So does this idea pass muster with medical ethicists?

Not by a long shot, said Arthur Caplan, head of the division of bioethics at New York University Langone Medical Center in New York. “There’s an argument to be made that if you’re single or gay, it kind of renders you infertile due to practical circumstances, even if not for biological reasons.”

Dr. Dominic Wilkinson, associate editor of the journal that published Richie’s paper, also weighed in: “Climate change is important, but carbon caps should be applied equally and fairly. They should not be used to discriminate against those who are single or gay.” D.K.

Deborah Kotz can be reached at dkotz@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @debkotz2.
Loading comments...
You're reading  1 of 5 free articles.
Get UNLIMITED access for only 99¢ per week Subscribe Now >
You're reading1 of 5 free articles.Keep scrolling to see more articles recomended for you Subscribe now
We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.