To continue getting breaking news and the full stories from The Boston Globe, subscribe today.

The Boston Globe

Metro

Political Intelligence

Romney, Brown face tests of sincerity

Mitt Romney and Scott Brown are two different political animals with two different political goals this year, yet their fates are intertwined with two offsetting challenges. Romney must convince the broader electorate that the policy flip-flops and other machinations he engaged in to become the GOP nominee won’t continue in the White House. Brown has to prove to Bay State voters the bipartisan streak the Republican has shown in the two years since his special election win will continue.

Are you a home delivery subscriber?

Get FREE access as part of your print subscription

Start Here

Contact us for help

  • Phone

    888-MY-GLOBE

    Monday-Friday 6:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m.

    Saturday, Sunday and Holidays 7:30 a.m.- 12:00 noon

  • Chat

    Start a chat

    Monday-Sunday 8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m.

  • E-mail

    support@bostonglobe.com

Comments

Brown's bill (S. 1871) did NOT pass the Senate. It was S. 2038 filed by Sen. Lieberman which passed 96-3.

This comment has been removed.

It is amazing that the Massachusetts papers have spoken of Brown as if he authored and pushed the bill through single handedly. In fact, the bill had its origins in the House bill that Representative Louise Slaughter introduced in 2006 and in all subsequent Congresses. Until the 60 Minutes show, it had 6 co-sponsors in the House. Both Senators Gillibrand and Brown edited that bill and introduced their own versions. Gillibrand had 25 sponsors and Brown had 8. Both were referred to the Homeland Security Committee and then were sent to the floor. It is interesting that the Boston Globe did not employ the same "rule" they and various fact checkers used on Kerry's bills - to give credit only to the lead sponsor of the bill that actually passed. In this case, Joe Lieberman. I think Brown showed political skill in seeing 60 minutes and having his staff quickly edit the Slaughter bill, but I think that his interaction with President Obama was grandstanding at its worst. The President in his speech already called for a bill -- and Brown had NOTHING to do with that. Glen Johnson even gives Brown the credit for getting the House behind the bill. I have never seen anyone do less and get more credit.

I wonder if the Donald asked to see Willard's birth certificate before he made his endorsement. Maybe Mitt was actually born in Mexico?

What a shock that Brown, who seems to want to be mini-Mitt, is viewed as being as insincere as Mitt. Maybe he hops the Mittster will make him VP.

Senator Brown's "Sincerity Test" is to keep doing what he's been doing? This seems like a rather weak premise to tie him to Romney.