Read as much as you want on BostonGlobe.com, anywhere and anytime, for just 99¢.

Bruins Live

1

0

2nd Prd 4:22

Lorillard fights $152m verdict

An attorney for Lorillard Tobacco Co.told the state’s highest court Monday that a landmark $152 million verdict against the company for giving free cigarettes to children in Roxbury in the 1950s was legally flawed and should be overturned.

In his oral argument to the Supreme Judicial Court, Paul F. Ware Jr. said there was no evidence presented at a Suffolk Superior Court civil trial that directly linked the giveaway of Newport cigarettes in the Orchard Park neighborhood to the smoking addiction that ultimately killed Marie Evans.

Continue reading below

“There was an utter failure of proof of causation in this case,’’ he said. “At some point, we concede, she was addicted . . . but there is no proof of causation, addiction, at that age.’’

Evans’s son, Willie Evans, sued Lorillard, blaming them for introducing his mother to cigarette smoking by giving her free samples of Newports when she was 9 years old and living in the Orchard Park housing development in the 1950s. By the age of 13, she was addicted, a jury found.

Marie Evans smoked while pregnant with her first and only child and also after suffering a heart ­attack when she was 36. She was still smoking when she died in 2002 of small-cell lung cancer at 54.

The jury sided with Willie Evans in December 2010 after six days of deliberations, awarding his mother’s estate $50 million and Willie Evans himself $71 million, an amount that has steadily ­increased from subsequent challenges in the appellate courts by the tobacco company. In September 2011, the judge also sided with Willie Evans and his mother’s estate, ruling that the tobacco company should be punished monetarily for its actions.

Under questioning Monday by Justice Margot Botsford, Ware said the case must also be thrown out because the plaintiffs never proved that Newport cigarettes were different from any other cigarette sold in the United States at the time Marie Evans was purchasing them.

“It remains the plaintiff’s burden to show something distinctive about Newport,’’ he said. “Nothing was proved as unique to Newport.’’

Ware also said that the trial judge, Superior Court Judge Elizabeth M. Fahey, made a key legal error when she ruled Evans could collect 12 percent interest on the verdict dating back to 2004, a penalty which by itself has since grown to $100 million.

“It represents the $100 million error in this case,’’ Ware said. “No interest should have been awarded.’’

But Willie Evans’s attorney, Michael D. Weisman, said that the Lorillard attorney had misrepresented the evidence from both plaintiff and defense experts that the jury relied on when reaching their verdict.

He said jurors learned from company documents that Newport menthol cigarettes were created in 1957 solely to attract younger smokers. The jury also heard, Weisman said, that the firm boasted in an annual report that the giveaways were an effective marketing tool.

“She had always been addicted,’’ he said. “That’s why Lorillard targeted kids. When you get kids early, you change their brains early and irrevocably. . . . She became addicted at 13.’’

Weisman said that Fahey was correct to draw on a law on the books since 1913 when she ordered the tobacco company to pay the interest.

The Supreme Judicial Court will rule on the appeal at a later date.

John R. Ellement can be reached at ellement@
­globe.c­om
.
Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week