Read as much as you want on BostonGlobe.com, anywhere and anytime, for just 99¢.

Bruins Live

3

2

3rd Prd 8:51

Patriots Live

17

16

Final

Supreme Court says Miranda rule is out for inmates

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court said yesterday that investigators do not have to read Miranda rights to inmates during jailhouse interrogations about crimes unrelated to their current incarceration.

The high court, on a 6-3 vote, overturned a federal appeals court decision throwing out the conviction of prison inmate Randall Lee Fields, saying Fields was not in custody as defined by Miranda and therefore did not have to have his rights read to him.

Continue reading below

“Imprisonment alone is not enough to create a custodial situation within the meaning of Miranda,’’ Justice Samuel Alito wrote in the court’s majority opinion.

Three justices, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, and Sonia Sotomayor, dissented and said the court’s decision would limit the rights of prisoners.

“Today, for people already in prison, the court finds it adequate for the police to say: ‘You are free to terminate this interrogation and return to your cell,’ ’’ Ginsburg said. “Such a statement is no substitute for one ensuring that an individual is aware of his rights.’’

Previous rulings have required Miranda warnings before police interrogations for people in custody, defined as when a reasonable person would think he cannot end the questioning and leave.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com