WASHINGTON — A bipartisan quartet of senators, including two National Rifle Association members and two with ‘‘F’’ ratings from the potent firearms lobby, are quietly trying to find a compromise on expanding the requirement for gun sale background checks.
A deal, given a good chance by several participants and lobbyists, could add formidable political momentum to one of the key elements of President Obama’s gun control plan. Currently, background checks are required only for sales by the nation’s 55,000 federally licensed gun dealers, but not for gun show, person-to-person sales, or other private transactions.
The senators’ talks have included discussions about ways to encourage states to make more mental health records available to the national system and the types of transactions that might be exempted from background checks, such as sales among relatives or to those who have permits to carry concealed weapons, said people who spoke anonymously because they were not authorized to describe the negotiations publicly.
The private discussions involve liberal Chuck Schumer of New York, who is the No. 3 Senate Democratic leader; Joe Manchin of West Virginia, an NRA member and one of the chamber’s more moderate Democrats; Republican Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, another NRA member and one of the more conservative lawmakers in Congress; and GOP moderate Mark Kirk of Illinois.
‘‘It will not limit your ability to borrow your Uncle Willie’s hunting rifle or share a gun with your friend at a shooting range,’’ Schumer said last week in one of the senators’ few public remarks about the package the group is seeking. He said he believed a bipartisan deal could be reached.
Polls show that requiring background checks for nearly all gun purchases has more public support than Obama’s proposals to ban assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines, and it is among those given the best chance of enactment. Even so, it is opposed by the NRA and many congressional Republicans, who consider it intrusive and unworkable for a system they say already has flaws.
‘‘My problem with background checks is you’re never going to get criminals to go through background checks,’’ Wayne LaPierre, NRA executive vice president, told the Senate Judiciary Committee at its gun control hearing last week.
An agreement among the four senators could help overcome that opposition by opening the door to support from other conservative Republicans besides Coburn. It also could make it easier to win backing from Democratic senators from GOP-leaning states, many of whom face reelection next year and who have been leery of embracing Obama’s proposals.
Schumer and Kirk each have ‘‘F’’ scores from the NRA, while Coburn and Manchin have ‘‘A’’ ratings.
Prompted by the December massacre of 20 first-graders and six adults in Newtown, Conn., the Democratic-led Judiciary Committee plans to write gun control legislation in the next few weeks. The committee’s chairman, Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, has expressed strong support for universal background checks and it is expected to be a cornerstone of his bill, but a version of that language with bipartisan support could give the entire package a boost.
It is likely that any gun control bill will need 60 votes to pass the 100-member Senate. Democrats have 55 votes, including two Democratic-leaning independents.
Leaders of the GOP-run House are planning to see what, if anything, the Senate passes before moving on gun legislation. Strategists believe that a measure that passes the Senate with clear bipartisan support could pressure the House to act.