Senator vows to hold up defense, CIA nominees

Wants answers on Libya before allowing a vote

Senator Lindsey Graham
Ann Heisenfelt/Associated Press
“We know nothing about what the president did on the night,’’ Senator Lindsey Graham said.

WASHINGTON — Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said Sunday he would hold up Senate confirmation of President Obama’s nominees to head the Pentagon and the CIA until the White House provided more answers about the Sept. 11 attack against a US installation in Benghazi, Libya.

Graham accused the White House of ‘‘stonewalling’’ requests to release more information about the attack that killed four Americans. ‘‘We’re going to get to the bottom of Benghazi,’’ he said on CBS’s ‘‘Face the Nation.’’

A Democratic colleague branded Graham’s threat to stall the nominations of former senator Chuck Hagel, a Nebraska Republican, to be defense secretary and John Brennan, Obama’s top counterterrorism adviser, to be CIA director as ‘‘unprecedented and unwarranted.’’ Senators should have the chance to vote on the fate of those nominees, said Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island.


The White House took aim at Graham, a persistent critic of Obama’s response to the terrorist assault, by urging quick approval of the president’s nominees and scolding any lawmakers trying to ‘‘play politics’’ with critical nominations.

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

White House officials did not address Graham’s demand for more information, but did note that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Army General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, testified Thursday before Congress about the chaotic day of the Sept. 11 attack.

In January, Graham had signaled he would delay Brennan’s pick and told Fox News he would ‘‘absolutely’’ block Hagel unless Panetta and Dempsey testified about the Benghazi attack. The senator said he was ‘‘happy as a clam’’ when he learned the hearing with Panetta and Dempsey had been scheduled.

Republicans have accused the Obama administration of an election-year coverup of the attack and at the hearing several suggested that Obama was disengaged as Americans died.

‘‘We know nothing about what the president did on the night of September 11th during a time of national crisis, and the American people need to know what their commander in chief did, if anything, during this eight-hour attack,’’ Graham said on CBS.


Graham contended that a six-person rescue team was delayed from leaving the Benghazi airport because of problems ‘‘with the militias releasing them and a lot of bureaucratic snafus,’’ and he said he wants to know whether Obama called any Libyan officials to expedite their mission.

‘‘I don’t think we should allow Brennan to go forward for the CIA directorship, Hagel to be confirmed to secretary of defense until the White House gives us an accounting,’’ Graham said, adding, ‘‘What did he do that night? That’s not unfair. The families need to know; the American people need to know.’’

Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the White House’s National Security Council, said, ‘‘We believe the Senate should act swiftly to confirm John Brennan and Senator Hagel. These are critical national security positions and individual members shouldn’t play politics with their nominations.’’

Reed said that ‘‘to dwell on a tragic incident and use that to block people is not appropriate. To try to find information, to ask legitimate questions, as Senator Graham is doing is completely appropriate.

“But then to turn around and say, ‘I’m going to disrupt, essentially, the nomination of two key members of the president’s Cabinet,’ I don’t think that’s appropriate, I don’t think it’s warranted, I think it is an overreaction that is not going to serve the best interest going forward of the national security of the United States.’’


Graham would have none of it.

pressing on Benghazi

‘‘In a constitutional democracy, we need to know what our commander in chief was doing at a time of great crisis, and this White House has been stonewalling the Congress, and I’m going to do everything I can to get to the bottom of this so we’ll learn from our mistakes and hold this president accountable for what I think is tremendous disengagement at a time of national security crisis,’’ he said.

At the Senate hearing, Panetta testified that he and Dempsey were meeting with Obama when they first learned of the Libya assault. He said the president told them to deploy forces as quickly as possible.

Graham asked whether Panetta spoke again to Obama after that first meeting. Panetta said no, but that the White House was in touch with military officials and aware of what was happening. At one point, Graham asked Panetta if he knew what time Obama went to sleep that night. The Pentagon chief said he did not.

On Friday, the chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee had said he planned to press ahead with a vote on Hagel’s nomination, rejecting Republicans demands for more financial information from Obama’s choice as setting an unprecedented standard.

In a letter, Senator Carl Levin provided a rebuttal to the GOP requests for data on Hagel’s paid speeches and foreign donors to private entities he has been affiliated with.