NSA director: Programs disrupted dozens of attacks

“I want the American people to know that we’re trying to be transparent here,” said General Keith Alexander, National Security Agency Director.
Manuel Balce Ceneta/associated press
“I want the American people to know that we’re trying to be transparent here,” said General Keith Alexander, National Security Agency Director.

WASHINGTON — The director of the National Security Agency said Wednesday that once-secret surveillance programs disrupted dozens of terrorist attacks, explicitly describing for Congress how the programs worked in collecting Americans’ phone records and tapping into their Internet activity.

Vigorously defending the programs, General Keith Alexander said the public needs to know how they operate amid growing concerns that government efforts to secure the nation are encroaching on Americans’ privacy and civil liberties.

‘‘I do think it’s important that we get this right and I want the American people to know that we’re trying to be transparent here, protect civil liberties and privacy but also the security of this country,’’ Alexander told a Senate panel.


Alexander said he will provide additional information to the Senate Intelligence Committee in closed session on Thursday and hopes to have as many details as possible within a week. He said he wants the information to be checked first by other agencies to ensure that the details are correct.

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

But he warned that disclosures about the secret programs have eroded agency capabilities and, as a result, US allies and Americans will not be as safe as they were two weeks ago.

‘‘Some of these are still going to be classified and should be, because if we tell the terrorists every way that we’re going to track them, they will get through and Americans will die,’’ he said, adding that he would rather be criticized by people who think he’s hiding something ‘‘than jeopardize the security of this country.’’

He was questioned at length by senators seeking information on exactly how much data the NSA collects and the legal backing for the activities. He did not give details on the plots he said had been disrupted.

Half a world away, Edward Snowden, the former contractor who fled to Hong Kong and leaked the documents, said he’s not there to hide from justice and has faith in ‘‘the courts and people of Hong Kong to decide my fate.’’


‘‘I am neither traitor nor hero. I’m an American,’’ Snowden told the South China Morning Post.

Snowden said in the interview published Wednesday that he has not dared contact his family or his girlfriend since coming forward as the leaker of NSA documents. ‘‘I am worried about the pressure they are feeling from the FBI,’’ he said. The FBI visited his father’s house in Pennsylvania on Monday.

Snowden resurfaced in the Chinese newspaper after dropping out of sight since Sunday. Snowden said he wanted to fight the US government in Hong Kong’s courts and would stay unless ‘‘asked to leave.’’ Hong Kong is a Chinese autonomous region that maintains a Western-style legal system and freedom of speech.

US law enforcement officials have said they are building a case against Snowden but have yet to bring charges. Hong Kong has an extradition treaty with the United States; there are exceptions in cases of political persecution or where there are concerns about cruel or humiliating treatment.

Snowden told the paper from a location the paper did not disclose that he has no plans to leave.


‘‘I have had many opportunities to flee [Hong Kong], but I would rather stay and fight the US government in the courts, because I have faith in [Hong Kong’s] rule of law,’’ he said.

‘I want the American people to know that we’re trying to be transparent here.’

On Tuesday, a phalanx of FBI, legal, and intelligence officials briefed the entire House of Representatives in an effort to explain National Security Agency programs that collect millions of Americans’ phone and Internet records. Since they were revealed last week, the programs have provoked distrust in the Obama administration from around the world.

House members were told not to disclose what they heard in the briefing because it is classified. Several said they left with unanswered questions.

‘‘People aren’t satisfied,’’ said Tim Murphy, a Pennsylvania Republican. ‘‘More detail needs to come out.’’

While many rank-and-file members of Congress have expressed anger and bewilderment, there is apparently very little appetite among leaders and intelligence committee chiefs to pursue any action. Most have expressed support for the programs as invaluable counterterrorism tools and some have labeled Snowden a traitor.

Congressional leaders and intelligence committee members have been routinely briefed about the spy programs, officials said, and Congress has at least twice renewed laws approving them. But the disclosure of their sheer scope stunned some lawmakers, shocked foreign allies from nations with strict privacy protections, and emboldened civil liberties advocates who long have accused the government of being too invasive in the name of national security.