GOP has advantage in fight for US House

Redistricting transforms field in their favor

Chris Jankowski was the architect of the GOP’s effort, REDMAP, which stands for Redistricting Majority Project.
Steve Helber/Associated Press
Chris Jankowski was the architect of the GOP’s effort, REDMAP, which stands for Redistricting Majority Project.

WASHINGTON — Even if Democrats recruit great candidates, raise gobs of money, and run smart campaigns, they face an uphill fight to retake control of the House in this year’s congressional elections, regardless of the political climate in November.

Republican strategists spent years developing a plan to take advantage of the 2010 census, first by winning key state legislatures and then redrawing House districts to tilt the playing field in their favor.

In states such as Ohio, Michigan, and North Carolina, Republicans were able to shape congressional maps to pack as many Democratic voters as possible into the fewest House districts. The process, called gerrymandering, left fertile ground elsewhere in each state to spread Republican voters among more districts, increasing the GOP’s chances of winning more seats.


Geography helped, too, in some states. Democratic voters are more likely to live in densely populated urban areas, making it easier to pack them into fewer districts.

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

The first payoff came in 2012, when Republicans kept control of the House despite Democratic support that swept President Obama to a second term. The next payoff is likely to come this fall.

Gerrymandering has a long history in the United States, pursued enthusiastically by both Democrats and Republicans. But the GOP’s success at it this decade has been historic: In 2012, Republicans achieved a 33-seat majority in the House, even though GOP candidates as a group got 1.4 million fewer votes than their Democratic opponents.

It was only the second time since World War II that the party receiving the most votes failed to win a majority of House seats, according to statistics compiled by the House Clerk. Democrats gained eight seats but were still a minority.

‘‘The fact that Republicans controlled redistricting (after 2010) meant that they were able to build up a wall, stopping a lot of the tide from running out,’’ said Justin Levitt, a law professor and redistricting expert at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. ‘‘They were able to shore up a lot of the districts that had been won by, in many cases, Tea Party freshmen or other Republican freshmen.’’


The Republicans’ advantage will fade as the population changes. In the meantime, Democrats control the White House and the Senate, while Republicans control the House, giving the GOP powerful leverage to block Obama’s second-term agenda.

How did Republicans gain their advantage? It all started with the party’s sweeping victories in 2010 and a plan called REDMAP. The 2010 election was a disaster for Democrats. Republicans picked up 63 seats to win control of the House. They also gained seats in the Senate, though Democrats kept a majority.

Perhaps more important, Republicans won control of state legislatures in crucial states, giving the party the edge that is still paying dividends.

Every 10 years, states, following the national census, redraw the boundaries of House districts to account for population changes. Some states gain seats and others lose, so the overall total remains 435.

In most states, the legislature and the governor draw up the new districts, which is why political parties pay special attention to elections at the start of each decade.


‘‘I think Democrats made a terrible mistake. They did not put nearly enough attention or resources into legislative races at the state level,’’ said Matt Bennett, a former aide to President Clinton. ‘‘A bunch of these legislatures slipped by very narrow margins, and some of them flipped for the first time since Reconstruction in the South.’’

For Republicans, it was a combination of luck and planning. The political winds were in their favor, but they also had been plotting for years to take full advantage of redistricting.

REDMAP — Redistricting Majority Project — called for targeting races in states that were expected to gain or lose congressional seats. GOP strategists reasoned that redistricting could have a greater impact in these states because there would have to be more changes to district boundaries, said Chris Jankowski, former president of the Republican State Leadership Committee.

Republicans spent more than $30 million through REDMAP to help elect legislative majorities in states such as Ohio, Michigan, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, Jankowski said.

Before the 2010 election, the GOP had majorities in 36 state legislative bodies. Afterward, the party controlled 56, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. In almost half the states, Republicans won control of the entire redistricting process.