Nation

GOP blames Cruz for opportunity to confirm nominees

Senator Ted Cruz sought to force a vote on President Obama’s immigration policy, but the maneuver allowed Democrats more time to confirm 12 judicial and 11 other appointees. (AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke)
AP Photo/Lauren Victoria Burke
Senator Ted Cruz sought to force a vote on President Obama’s immigration policy, but the maneuver allowed Democrats more time to confirm 12 judicial and 11 other appointees.

WASHINGTON — Unhappy Republicans say Senator Ted Cruz of Texas has given President Obama a present this holiday season — a gift certificate good for confirmation of 12 judicial appointments by the outgoing Democratic-controlled Senate.

Aides for Cruz, a Tea Party favorite and potential 2016 presidential contender, say he was not responsible for the outcome. But there was no denying that Democrats, who will turn over power to Republicans in January, are in position to confirm not only the judges, but 11 other appointees before the Senate wraps up work for the year.

Among them are nominees that Republicans have sought to block for two relatively high-profile posts. They include Dr. Vivek Murthy of Boston, who was confirmed Monday as surgeon general. Another is Sarah Saldana, who has been picked to head Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the agency that will oversee a new immigration policy that Cruz wants to defund.

Advertisement

Senators are set to vote Tuesday on Daniel Santos, who has waited more than 500 days to be confirmed as a member of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, one of the longest waits ever for an Obama pick.

Get Ground Game in your inbox:
Daily updates and analysis on national politics from James Pindell.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Others set for confirmation Tuesday include Frank A. Rose of Massachusetts to be assistant secretary of state for verification and compliance; Antony Blinken to be a deputy secretary of state; and Saldana.

At the root of the dispute over the nominees are a combination of the Senate’s all-but-indecipherable rules, Cruz’s attempt to use murky tactics to his advantage, and a bipartisan desire of many lawmakers to finish work for the year and return home for the holidays.

‘‘My concern about the strategy he employed is that it has a result he didn’t intend,’’ Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine, said of Cruz’s maneuverings on Friday night, when he sought to force a vote on Obama’s immigration policy.

Among the consequences, Collins said, would be confirmation of a number of appointees who are controversial, including some to ‘‘lifetime judicial’’ posts.

Advertisement

Some officials said Cruz was personally informed by GOP aides that Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada was primed to take advantage if he went ahead.

Under the Senate’s rules, Cruz’s maneuver allowed Reid to begin the time-consuming process of confirming nominations on Saturday at noon — when lawmakers had been scheduled to be home for the weekend.

Had Cruz not made his move when he did, according to officials in both parties, Reid would have had to wait until Monday night — more than 48 hours later. Disgruntled Republicans said they felt confident that Reid’s rank and file would not have been willing to remain in Washington in that case, and only four or five nominees would be confirmed instead of 23.

Other Republican lawmakers were far more forceful than Collins in their judgment of Cruz on Monday. They declined to speak on the record, possibly feeling they had already done so enough during the unplanned, 12-hour Senate session on Saturday.

‘‘You should have an end goal in sight if you’re going to do these types of things, and I don’t see an end goal other than irritating a lot of people,’’ Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah said then.

Advertisement

Particularly galling to one Republican was that Reid was now in position to win confirmation even for judicial nominees who had been approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee since the midterm elections in which Democrats lost power. Senator Chuck Grassley, Republican of Iowa, said Saturday evening that was a violation of precedent ‘‘and of course, I object.’’

Others said Cruz’s maneuvering was reminiscent of his role in a showdown two years ago that led to a partial government shutdown that most Republicans warned him would be a mistake.

Cruz’s stated goal this time was to force a vote on Obama’s new immigration policy, which is removing the threat of deportation for an estimated 5 million immigrants living in the country illegally.

He made his move Friday evening, after senators already had been informed they were free to go until Monday without fear of missing any votes. In response to Cruz, Reid ordered a Saturday session. Some senators who had left for home drove back hastily to avoid black marks on their voting records.

Far more important in the minds of Republicans, was that Reid responded by launching an immediate effort to confirm the judicial and agency appointees, some of them long stalled. One of them, Christopher Smith, has been awaiting Senate confirmation to an Energy Department post since January.

Cruz’s office swiftly disputed the claim. ‘‘Everyone knows Harry Reid planned to jam forward as many nominees as he could,’’ Phil Novack, a spokesman for Cruz, said by e-mail. ‘‘Unfortunately, there are many on both sides of the aisle who would rather stoke stories about Ted Cruz to distract from the more important debate over the president’s unilateral action to grant amnesty.’’