On the ballot in Massachusetts this November


Arguments for:

 Humane option to alleviate suffering at the end of life.


 In Oregon and Washington, patients infrequently choose to use end-of-life drugs.

Arguments against:

Get Political Happy Hour in your inbox:
Your afternoon shot of politics, sent straight from the desk of Joshua Miller.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

 Fragile patients could be coerced to end their lives.

 Compromises the role of physicians and their commitment to preserving life.


Arguments for:


 Can relieve painful symptoms for patients with chronic conditions.

 Restricted to those with doctor’s permission.

Arguments against:

 Could increase access to drugs for general public.

 Unnecessary, since small amounts of marijuana are ­already decriminalized.


Arguments for:

 Levels playing field for independent auto body shops.

 Would give consumers more options for car repair.

Arguments against:

 Could force redesign of ­vehicles to fit new rules.

 Independent shops can ­already purchase the same equipment as dealerships.

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com