A third new poll has found Elizabeth Warren pulling ahead of Senator Scott Brown, giving the Democratic challenger momentum before their first debate Thursday.
A Suffolk University/WHDH-TV survey released late Monday had Warren at 48 percent and Brown at 44 percent, within the poll’s margin of error but the opposite of a similar poll in May. That Suffolk/WHDH survey had Brown at 48 percent and Warren at 47 percent.
Comments
My God.....where was the boy senator early on in his tenure in the Senate? Why he was hanging out with mcconnel, kyl, thune, and other republican leaders....vying for the attention and priority of following their lead and Senate policy of making President Obama a "one term president".....Good call there junior which was about the same time you were taking campaign contributions from the koch brothers...billionaire tea party types who are trying to buy this presidential election. Did I mention that these two nuts have investments in keeping energy costs high? Another "good" decision for the boy senator. It is (sardonically speaking) to watch those Lincoln-esque types adds he is currently running as an aw-shucks type underdog running against the elite Ms. Warren and her Harvard pedigree. It is not a pun when I say "l'il scotty does not have his clothes on" because I am hoping and praying that the majority of the Massachusetts electorate can see your very thin veneer of trying to be one of us. This job has big shoes with no need of a small head of which you are over your head. You are basically a fraud who has no creditability in the position you are currently in. Elizabeth Warren is much more in touch with the current issues facing our country than you are trying to manage an identity as good ole truck drivin', Carhart jacket wearing wannabe who thinks he can do what is best for Massachusetts. I'm not buying that....
"trying to be one of us"!..Who would want to hang around people like you..not me dumbo
Pass the popcorn the debates Thurs at 7pm on Channel 4 should be interesting. Each candidate will have more than 30 seconds to express their views and priorities for legislation. Hope everyone tunes in.
This comment has been removed.
Scotty would have us believe that he is bright, barncoat-wearing, truck driving politician. If he actually were any of the above instead of a whiny, mealy mouthed two-faced political hack, he might be a decent senator. But the fact is that he is unable to understand the bills he votes on until his people explain them to him and tell him what to do.
This state is obviously voting to re-elect President Obama and this time the president needs the right congress and senate so good proposals go through. Enough with the current group and nothing getting through!
It may get your wish, but you won't like it! Unless you're a member of the 47 percenters! You know the "gimme/you owe me crowd !
Since I could vote, in the mid-sixties, I believe Massachusetts has been represented by strong leadership in the Senate whether Republican ( Senator Brooke ) or Democrat ( Senator Ted Kennedy ) among others. I noticed that early on the Republican hierarchy have purposely left Senator Scott Brown out of the loop. Why? Too be perfectly honest, their reasons do not matter. Their actions then and now spoke and speak volumes. Senator Brown does not "lead." This election goes much deeper than between the American Indian heritage lady ( doubtful at best ) the secret conversationalist with kings and queens and prime ministers ( also doubtfu at bestl ). I'm looking at the issues, not the sideshow.
Too much important business coming up to trust Brown not to serve his republican masters. Supreme Court nominations, budgets, etc. I don't love Warren, but she has my vote.