Politics

Hillary Clinton defends record on Benghazi amid GOP criticism

Hillary Clinton testified before the House Select Committee on Benghazi in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

Carolyn Kaster/AP

Hillary Clinton testified before the House Select Committee on Benghazi in Washington, D.C., on Thursday.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hillary Rodham Clinton firmly defended her record before, during and after the Benghazi attacks as she came face-to-face Thursday with the Republican-led special investigation of the 2012 violence in Libya, hoping to put to rest the worst episode of her tenure as secretary of state and clear an obstacle to her presidential campaign.

Contentious moments included questions and accusations about the Obama administration’s shifting ealry public account of the attacks.

Advertisement

Clinton, the front-runner to win the Democratic nomination, kicked off a long day of questioning with a plea that the United States maintain its global leadership role despite the threat posed to US diplomats. She hailed the efforts of the four Americans who died in the attacks, including the first ambassador in more than three decades, but told the House Benghazi Committee that the deadly events already have been exhaustively scrutinized.

Republicans pressed for answers on her record in the lead-up to the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks on the US diplomatic outpost in Benghazi and a nearby CIA compound, and how engaged she was on the deteriorating security situation in eastern Libya. The atmosphere remained mostly civil until a fiery back-and-forth with Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, who accused Clinton of deliberately misleading the public by linking the violence to an Internet video insulting the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

Get This Week in Politics in your inbox:
A weekly recap of the top political stories from The Globe, sent right to your email.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Clinton, stone-faced for much of the hearing, smiled in bemusement as Jordan cut her off from answering. Eventually given the chance to comment, she said only that ‘‘some’’ people had wanted to justify the attack based on that video and that she rejected that justification. The argument went to the origins of the disagreement over Benghazi and how President Barack Obama and his top aides represented the attack in the final weeks of his re-election campaign.

‘‘There were probably a number of different motivations’’ for the attack, Clinton said, describing a time when competing strands of intelligence were being received and no clear picture had yet emerged. Speaking directly to Jordan, she said: ‘‘The insinuations that you are making do a great disservice.’’

‘‘I'm sorry that it doesn’t fit your narrative. I can only tell you what the facts were,’’ Clinton said.

Advertisement

The hearing came at a moment of political strength for Clinton. On Wednesday, a potential rival for the Democratic nomination, Vice President Joe Biden, announced he would not join the race. Clinton also is riding the momentum of a solid debate performance last week. The Benghazi panel’s Republican chairman says he won’t call Clinton to appear a second time.

But Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina began by laying out a series of questions that he said remained unanswered: Why was the US in Libya, why were security requests denied, why was the military not ready to respond quickly on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 and why did the Obama administration change its story about the nature of the attacks in the weeks afterward?

‘‘These questions linger because previous investigations were not thorough,’’ Gowdy said.

Clinton addressed some of these matters early on. She stressed a need for diplomats to advance US interests in the world, even in dangerous places, and said perfect security can never be achieved. She noted the various attacks on US diplomatic and military installations overseas during the presidencies of her husband, Bill Clinton, in the 1990s and Ronald Reagan a decade earlier.

The US military campaign against Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 helped prevent ‘‘genocide,’’ Clinton asserted, noting the Libyan dictator’s threat to hunt down opponents like ‘‘cockroaches.’’ The American-led intervention came after requests for assistance from allies in Europe and the Arab world, and extensive study and discussion by the US government, she said.

Wearing a dark suit, Clinton appeared somber before the panel, holding her chin in her hand while Gowdy interrogated her. She nodded occasionally, such as when the committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, described the entire probe as a partisan campaign replete with implausible conspiracy theories.

The Republican criticism has included contentions by some lawmakers that Clinton personally denied security requests and ordered the US military to ‘‘stand down’’ during the attacks, or that her agency was engaged in an elaborate gun-running scheme in eastern Libya. None of these were substantiated in the independent Accountability Review Board investigation ordered by Clinton after the deadly incident, and seven subsequent congressional investigations.

Gowdy is engaged in his own balancing act, portraying the panel as focused on the facts after comments by fellow Republicans describing the inquiry as an effort designed to hurt Clinton’s presidential bid. Democrats have pounced on the remarks, and pointed out that the probe has now cost US taxpayers more than $4.5 million and, after 17 months, has lasted longer than the 1970s Watergate investigation.

The hearing was expected to last the whole day, with breaks. Clinton was certain to face questions about her use of a private email account and server while serving as Obama’s chief diplomat, another issue that has beset her campaign.

While Clinton appeared in control Thursday, FBI Director James Comey was testifying elsewhere on Capitol Hill at the same time, a reminder that she may face more examinations in the months ahead. The FBI has said little thus far about its investigation of the private email server.

Watch video of the hearing below:

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.