Politics
    Next Score View the next score

    Adam Schiff leverages Democrats’ limited power in Trump inquiry

    WASHINGTON, D.C. - MARCH 20: House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Ranking Member Adam Schiff (D-CA) speaks at the start of a House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence hearing concerning Russian meddling in the 2016 United States election, on Capitol Hill, March 20, 2017 in Washington, DC. While both the Senate and House Intelligence committees have received private intelligence briefings in recent months, Monday's hearing is the first public hearing on alleged Russian attempts to interfere in the 2016 election. (Photo by )
    Zach Gibson/Getty Images
    Represenative Adam Schiff.

    WASHINGTON — As attack dogs go, Rep. Adam B. Schiff, D-Calif., is more labradoodle than Doberman, his partisanship disguised by a thick fur of intense preparation, modulated locution and gentle accusations.

    So in a hearing on Monday of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, Schiff, a doe-eyed former federal prosecutor, politely probed James B. Comey, the FBI director, and carefully laid out the history of the Trump campaign’s contacts with Russian officials. It was a performance that showed how an avalanche of information can leverage the limited power of the minority party to damage a president.

    “His public style of questioning is very similar to his nonpublic style of interacting with colleagues,” said Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., another former prosecutor who as chairman of the committee investigating the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, was known for his pointed, even excitable style. “The courtroom is different from a committee hearing room in almost every way, but Adam has managed to make the transition well.”

    Advertisement

    In the hearing, Schiff successfully pressed Comey to say that the FBI had no evidence to support President Donald Trump’s claim that his predecessor, President Barack Obama, had tapped his phones in Trump Tower. Soon afterward, Comey confirmed what had been widely reported before Monday: The FBI is investigating whether members of Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia to influence the election, an admission that took Schiff by surprise, he said.

    Get This Week in Politics in your inbox:
    A weekly recap of the top political stories from The Globe, sent right to your email.
    Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

    It is a technique Schiff has employed repeatedly from his post as ranking Democrat on the intelligence committee, where he has pressed for a congressional authorization of military force against the Islamic State, and as a member of the Benghazi committee, where he tried to steer the investigation away from the role of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the attack on the U.S. government compound.

    “It’s a challenge,” Schiff said. “In the minority you don’t have the power of subpoena. You have the power of relationships and the ability to shine the public spotlight on issues, but you have to use that leverage judiciously.”

    Schiff, who represents a northern swath of Los Angeles County, helped found the Democratic Study Group on National Security in 2003 to go deep into national security concerns. He minors in transportation, as the author of the Rim of the Valley Corridor Study Act.

    Youthful, with a ruddy and cheerful visage, Schiff, 56, whose wife is actually named Eve, comes off like the guy who in high school talked to his prom date’s mother in the kitchen about the goings-on at the community garden.

    Advertisement

    But when he wants to hit, he does. On Monday morning, Schiff poked at Trump on Twitter, where the president had retreated to make pre-emptive attacks on the hearing, one of the few that congressional Republicans have staged to air evidence of Russian tampering with the election.

    As the hearing opened, Schiff moved to paint Trump’s campaign as repeatedly in collusion with Russian officials, a possibility Comey conceded is now the subject of a federal investigation.

    “Is it possible that all of these events and reports are completely unrelated and nothing more than an entirely unhappy coincidence?” Schiff said. “Yes, it is possible. But it is also possible, maybe more than possible, that they are not coincidental, not disconnected and not unrelated and that the Russians use the same techniques to corrupt U.S. persons that they employed in Europe and elsewhere. We simply don’t know, not yet. And we owe it to the country to find out.”

    With that, Schiff elicited responses from Comey and Adm. Michael S. Rogers, the director of the National Security Agency, by pressing them on whether the president’s Twitter messages and the statements by his aides to defend them had damaged America’s relations with allies like Britain and Germany.

    Rogers concurred with a strenuous denial by the British government that the Obama administration had asked its intelligence service Government Communications Headquarters, or GCHQ, to carry out surveillance of Trump Tower. He also acknowledged that it complicated America’s relationship with Germany to have Trump refer publicly to the Obama administration’s eavesdropping on Chancellor Angela Merkel, an operation that was made public by Edward J. Snowden.

    Advertisement

    Schiff, who was born in Massachusetts, was raised by a Democratic father and a Republican mother, and he has a photo in his office of his grandfather posing with President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Henry Cabot Lodge. A graduate of Stanford and Harvard Law School, Schiff was a U.S. attorney in Los Angeles, where he convicted the first FBI agent indicted for espionage in an old-style Cold War case. Before being elected to Congress, he served in the California state Legislature.

    Schiff has a son in middle school and a daughter at Northwestern University, and he moved his family to Washington in 2003. He alternates from family-only weekends to heavy work weekends, often spent in California, where he is thought to be considering a Senate run should Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, decide not to seek another term.

    For now, Schiff is focused on all things Trump. “I don’t think any of us can say where the investigation will conclude,’’ Schiff said. “It is very much in the public interest that we try to find out.’’