UN mediator for Syria quits; France says chemicals still used

Special envoy Lakhdar Brahimi (right) announced his exit, with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon at his side.
JC McIlwaine/United Nations/associated press
Special envoy Lakhdar Brahimi (right) announced his exit, with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon at his side.

UNITED NATIONS — International efforts to end the war in Syria faltered further on Tuesday as the UN mediator quit, citing frustrations over the moribund political negotiations, and France’s top diplomat said there was evidence the Syrian government used chemical weapons more than a dozen times after it had signed the treaty banning them.

Taken together, the two events pointed to the failings of the West’s signature efforts on Syria: finding a diplomatic way out of a civil war in its fourth year — and a pact that was proudly touted as stopping the Syrian government from using chemical weapons.

The UN secretary general, Ban Ki-moon, announced that he had accepted the resignation of his special envoy, Lakhdar Brahimi, who told reporters “It’s very sad that I leave this position and leave Syria behind in such a bad state.”


His departure — without a hint of who might succeed him — signaled the bleak prospects for peace in a conflict that has claimed more than 150,000 lives and shows no signs of abating, as President Bashar Assad says he intends to serve another seven-year term after staging elections in June. Brahimi’s announcement came just two days before Secretary of State John F. Kerry and his counterparts from European and Arab nations are to gather in London to discuss the crisis of Syria, with no new or obvious path forward.

Get Today's Headlines in your inbox:
The day's top stories delivered every morning.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Asked for his message to the Syrian people, Brahimi said later: “Apologies once more.”

But there were also signs of disarray within the Western coalition Tuesday, as France’s foreign minister, Laurent Fabius, expressed regret that the Obama administration had decided against using force after an Aug. 21 chemical weapons attack in the Damascus area that Western nations, led by the United States, blamed on forces loyal to Assad.

Though a US military strike was called off when Syria agreed to give up its chemical weapons, Fabius said there were indications that Syria had since waged 14 chemical attacks.

“We are examining the samples that were taken,” he said.


France, Fabius indicated, had been prepared to use force last year as part of an US-led coalition, but had not wanted to act alone. Had such a military strike been carried out, Fabius said, “we feel that it would have changed many things.”

While France had indicated chagrin over the Obama administration’s military pullback on Syria, it was unusual for France’s top diplomat to speak so frankly about it — in Washington, after a meeting with his US counterpart, Kerry.

Fabius’s assertions of chemical weapons use, most of them involving chlorine bombs, came as other signs pointed to Syrian government culpability. Human Rights Watch, in a report on Tuesday, said it had evidence that Assad’s forces had dropped chlorine-filled bombs from helicopters on three towns in Northern Syria in April. The chemical weapons treaty that Syria signed last year prohibits using chlorine as a weapon.

The State Department had no comment on Fabius’s assertions of chemical attacks, saying the matter was being investigated by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

Western officials have said in recent weeks that they were aware of reports that the use of chlorine might have occurred more than a dozen times.