To continue getting breaking news and the full stories from The Boston Globe, subscribe today.

The Boston Globe

Opinion

Juliette Kayyem

Smart nuclear reduction

The US could save billions of dollars and still have plenty of bombs

There are many ways for war to end: a decisive win, a painful defeat, a slog towards a tenuous political transfer, or even a “surge’’ in the guise of an exit. Any way you look at it, President Obama has gotten us out of two long wars. Surely, the Cold War can’t be harder? We already won. But from the cacophony of chest-thumping hard-liners over the mere suggestion, leaked to the press, that the White House may be considering reductions in our nuclear arsenal, the good old days of duck and cover live on.

Are you a home delivery subscriber?

Get FREE access as part of your print subscription

Start Here

Contact us for help

Comments

Indeed, our nuclear stockpiles are like NFL salaries. Their size is only considered in relation to the other guy. Meeting needs is kind of secondary, since there is more than will ever be needed in any event. And if you aren't pro-nuke in Congress, you are a wuss. Perhaps we ought to detonate one of these monsters in the U.S. in front of an audience so that the average hawk can begin to understand the unthinkable destructive power we are trying to control. Then they can stop trying to act tough, and can think about what's best for the earth. And that would surely include dialing down our nuclear arsenal.