To continue getting breaking news and the full stories from The Boston Globe, subscribe today.

The Boston Globe

Opinion

james carroll

This Christmas, Nativity story takes on new meaning

What child is this? The story of a vulnerable baby has rarely resonated more powerfully than this Christmas Eve. In Newtown, Conn., last week, President Obama raised the old questions that also resonate with new force: “Why are we here?” he asked, invoking all the world’s religions. “What gives our life meaning? What gives our acts purpose?” After noting the difficulties of “groping through the darkness,” the president concluded, “There’s only one thing we can be sure of, and that is the love we have for our children. . . The warmth of a small child’s embrace. That is true.” Christmas is the world-wide feast of that very warmth and that very truth.

Strikingly, in the earliest of the four Gospel explanations of Jesus as a source of meaning and purpose, there is no Nativity narrative, no child in the manger, no star in the sky. Instead, the Gospel of Mark, written around the year 70, begins with Jesus as a mature figure encountering John the Baptist, ready to take on the tyrant Herod Antipas and his Roman sponsors.

Comments

This comment has been removed.

This year, with 20 children lost, God’s heart, too, is broken.------More nonsense. Humanity, who cannot even understand the breadth of creation, attributes human feelings to God, whose nature and substance the entire people will never understand. Tragedy, pain and loss, unfortunately, is what moves humanity forward and changes souls. Using the column, we see how a king could order the death of all babies at one time, no problem. Not so today.

Replies

This comment has been removed.

This comment has been removed.

This comment has been removed.