Opinion

opinion | Chris Reddy

Five years after oil spill, how bad is the Gulf of Mexico today?

Pelicans nested along the coast of Cat Island in Louisiana on Sunday. The area was once a lush nesting site for thousands of birds before the 2010 oil spill.

REUTERS

Pelicans nested along the coast of Cat Island in Louisiana on Sunday. The area was once a lush nesting site for thousands of birds before the 2010 oil spill.

As the fifth anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster approached, I was asked countless times: How bad is the Gulf of Mexico today?

Maybe television dramas should be blamed for creating false perceptions on what science can do and how fast it can be done. But for scientists, the fifth anniversary is the 1,826th day since the damaged Macondo oil well began releasing about 75,000 gallons of oil per hour each day for 87 days into the Gulf.

Advertisement

At the time, the Gulf of Mexico was not pristine, and scientists lacked baseline knowledge about preexisting conditions. In an area full of oil rigs, where a spill was a good bet (if not inevitable), we had not conducted extensive, long-term research that would have captured what the Gulf was like before it was dosed with oil. Surprisingly little was known about the presence or absence of potentially toxic petroleum hydrocarbons on the seafloor even around the massive drilling rigs that inhabit the Gulf. That’s a lesson we should learn before we ever put the first oil rig in the Arctic Ocean.

The Gulf spill contained variables we hadn’t invested in learning much about: deep currents that would transport chemicals, for example, and which organisms are most vulnerable to oil. And it had inputs we couldn’t control, such as excess nutrients from the Mississippi River that promote anoxic “dead zones.’’

Get Arguable with Jeff Jacoby in your inbox:
Our conservative columnist offers a weekly take on everything from politics to pet peeves.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

In one study published in November 2014, my colleagues and I examined evidence of contamination on the seafloor near the damaged well. It was a massive effort, starting with little baseline information. We could account for 2 to 16 percent of the total oil discharged during the accident falling within a 1,250-square-mile patch on the deep seafloor. That was in 2012. I can’t say how much oil is still present today.

Similarly, scientists investigated impacts of the spill on coral communities 5,000 feet deep on the bottom of the Gulf (which they happened to know about only because they had conducted basic research searching for life in extreme environments). Scientists examined the corals in the fall of 2010 and published research in 2012 showing that some corals in the path of the oil fallout were much less healthy. They revisited those corals in 2011 and recently published that the corals’ recovery was mixed. We don’t know about their conditions today.

So how is the Gulf today? It is far from a graveyard predicted by some experts in the throes of the spill, but it’s not a picture of health. Some salt marshes such Barataria Bay, La., are still oiled. But we find little oil on most beaches or rocks, and some of the most toxic compounds are no longer present. We found that sunlight photochemically broke down a significant amount of the oil, but we yet don’t how toxic these transformed products are. (We have also shown that many oil samples we find in the Gulf are not from the Deepwater Horizon.) We are still investigating many complex, longer-term, harder-to-see consequences in the Gulf ecosystem.

Advertisement

To get a handle on the health of the Gulf or any other marine ecosystem, we need to invest in methods to examine them like bodies, not bodies of water. We must continue the effort to conduct difficult deep-sea detective work and to develop new technology to probe, monitor, and report in timely ways on a myriad biological, chemical, and physical conditions in the Gulf. Otherwise, we may not get fully satisfying answers on the next anniversary of Deepwater Horizon.

Chris Reddy is a marine geochemist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.
Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
You're reading  1 of 5 free articles.
Get UNLIMITED access for only 99¢ per week Subscribe Now >
You're reading1 of 5 free articles.Keep scrolling to see more articles recomended for you Subscribe now
We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com