Opinion

Alan Wirzbicki

Twitter should disable Donald Trump’s account

FILE-- President Donald Trump talks to reporters as he arrives in Ft. Myers, Fla., Sept. 14, 2017. Trump on Friday used an unfolding terrorist attack in London to revive his push for a travel ban for people from predominantly Muslim countries, an effort that has been hampered by U.S. courts. The proposed restrictions have faced legal challenges and drawn criticism because of concerns that they amount to discrimination based on religion. (Doug Mills/The New York Times)
Doug Mills/New York Times
President Trump talked to reporters in Fort Myers, Fla., on Sept. 14.

President Trump’s tweets destabilize the world and have raised fears about stumbling into an accidental war with North Korea. If Twitter were a responsible company, it would disable the president’s account to remove that possibility.

Silencing Trump’s tweets was the goal of an aborted effort by Valerie Plame Wilson, the former CIA spy who launched an effort this summer to raise money to buy Twitter and then boot Trump. As it turned out, her effort seems to have been little more than a publicity stunt. But her point made sense.

The idea of deleting Trump’s account has come up before, usually after especially offensive rounds of inflammatory or inciting tweets. Trump has come close to violating Twitter’s written terms of service, and arguably crossed it.

Advertisement

But whether Trump has obeyed Twitter’s terms of service should be beside the point. Those rules were written with ordinary people in mind, not unstable world leaders.

Get Arguable with Jeff Jacoby in your inbox:
From the Globe's must-read columnist, an extra offering each week of opinion and ideas.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

The traditional Silicon Valley dodge is that companies like Facebook and Twitter are mere platforms, and bear no responsibility for how they’re used. But Twitter doesn’t owe President Trump a platform, any more than newspapers are obliged to print letters from every crackpot. Shutting down Trump’s account wouldn’t wouldn’t set any sort of precedent — except possibly for other Twitter users with immediate access to nuclear weapons.

As for his personal free speech rights, Trump would still have plenty of ways to communicate his views. What banning him from Twitter would do is enforce some delay — force the president to count to 10, as it were, and maybe even consult with advisers first. (And I know — what he says on TV isn’t much more temperate.)

Twitter needs Trump — he accounts for about $2 billion of the company’s value — and the company has made it clear that his account is staying. But allowing itself to be a conduit for saber-rattling is making the company complicit.

Alan Wirzbicki is a Globe editorial writer. He can be reached at awirzbicki@globe.com.