cellphone deals | editorial

Tax should reflect full cost

GIVEN THE prices associated with too-good-to-be-true cellphone deals - “get a phone valued at $650 for just $149, if you just sign our two-year contract!’’ - it’s no surprise that people balk when hefty tax charges greet them at the checkout counter. Massachusetts is one of two states with a sales tax rule that specifically pertains to cellphone underpricing: Regardless of the discount offered on the phone, taxes are levied according to the actual retail price, which means the $150 phone in this scenario would cost the buyer about $40 in taxes, in addition to the price of the phone.

Consumers aren’t the only ones complaining; retailers are asking the Legislature to eliminate the rule, which they say puts stores at a competitive disadvantage. In truth, it’s hard to imagine a flood of people crossing state lines to buy iPhones, especially since Rhode Island is the other state that taxes phones this way.

Your comment is subject to the rules of our Posting Policy

This comment may appear on your public profile. Public Profile FAQ

We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com