You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

Editorial | Fukushima anniversary

Fill the safety gaps

Tokyo Electric Power Co. via REUTERS

The crippled Fukushima Daiichi plant.

LAST YEAR’S tragedy in three parts — an earthquake, a tsunami, and the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant — is known in Japan simply as 3/11. The suffering of so many will be remembered today, as will Japan’s resiliency in the year since. While the earthquake and tsunami were nature’s doing, the failures at Fukushima exposed fundamental safety and regulatory gaps. The disaster furthered the view that nuclear energy is “unsafe at any speed,’’ but that would be the wrong lesson for the United States.

The response to the Fukushima meltdown was deeply flawed. But with nearly 20 percent of America’s energy coming from nuclear energy, abandoning it is not a realistic option. Recognizing that, the Obama administration is likely to approve four new reactors by year’s end.

Continue reading below

Given the unthinkable consequences of any nuclear meltdown, effective oversight requires an honest assessment of risk. This includes a rule that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission take into account extreme circumstances that might compromise a reactor, such as the Missouri River flooding that closed a Nebraska facility last year. At the very time that a unified commission is necessary to implement its ongoing Fukushima review, the majority of NRC members seem more interested in challenging its aggressive chairman, Gregory Jaczko. That’s got to change.

Locally, efforts by Attorney General Martha Coakley and the public to demand greater transparency and input into relicensing of the Pilgrim nuclear facility in Plymouth - the only facility with a Fukushima-like design that is currently before the commission - will only generate greater confidence in nuclear safety. The industry’s continuing opposition to an appropriate level of oversight is self-destructive and dangerous.

Because nuclear energy provides carbon-emissions-free electricity, it needs to be part of a long-term national energy strategy. But Fukushima is a cautionary tale that will never be forgotten, and must be heeded.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.