You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

editorial

City Council redistricting map must protect neighborhood cohesion

THE BOSTON City Council is reasonably close to agreement on a new, nine-district electoral map that conforms with growth and shifts in population over the last decade. But there are still some raw spots that need attention before they develop into major wounds.

For a redistricting plan to succeed, it needs to take account of communities of interest — ethnic groups, language groups, and economic classes — so that people with common concerns aren’t packed into so few districts as to minimize their impact or scattered so evenly across districts that they have no influence in any. This isn’t an exact science. Sometimes, incumbency protection bumps up against neighborhood cohesiveness. If so, the latter should prevail.

Continue reading below

In Boston, there are two competing maps. The first, favored by Councilor Bill Linehan, spreads the difficulties that follow redistricting — such as wooing new voter groups — evenly among the incumbents. But it fractures communities of interest in Roxbury’s Mission Hill and Newmarket Square, and Uphams Corner in Dorchester. A second map, crafted by Councilors Tito Jackson and Matt O’Malley, protects those neighborhoods. Their map does, however, isolate Linehan somewhat from part of his traditional base in South Boston. And Linehan, who has spent long hours chairing the redistricting committee, isn’t amused — especially after winning reelection last fall by less than 100 votes.

The needs of the neighborhood are paramount. If councilors have to choose between the two maps, they should pick Jackson and O’Malley’s. But a compromise could be in the offing. Council President Stephen Murphy is pushing the redistricting committee, which meets today, to find a fair solution. The council has a lot of work on its hands, including budget hearings and changes to the school-assignment policy. A drawn-out redistricting battle serves no one’s interests, and the challenges are hardly insurmountable.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.