You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

editorial

Failures at state drug lab warrant independent probe

A broad administrative inquiry into the management failures at the now-shuttered state drug analysis laboratory in Jamaica Plain should be conducted by an independent investigator with the power to subpoena witnesses. Leaving the probe in the hands of the state attorney general’s office opens too many avenues for potential conflicts of interest.

The Massachusetts Bar Association and prominent legal defense groups have no qualms about the attorney general’s criminal investigation of Annie Dookhan, the former chemist suspected of tainting drug evidence at the lab. Nor should they. It was the attorney general’s office, in conjunction with the State Police, that uncovered the Dookhan mess in the first place. But the legal groups reasonably object to a broader investigation being placed under the control of a state agency that could be perceived as having a stake in the outcome. The attorney general necessarily has close working relationships with district attorneys and the State Police, and there’s a possibility that the AG’s office could be called upon to defend the Commonwealth in future litigation related to the lab scandal.

Continue reading below

Any review should go deeper than the hiring of forensic experts to scrub the drug lab and determine if any chemists other than Dookhan might have tainted evidence. What, for example, is the public supposed to make of the fact that the district attorneys weren’t informed of Dookhan’s misdeeds until eight months after her supervisors discovered irregularities? Did Dookhan initiate inappropriate communications with any prosecutors other than one in Norfolk County? And how did standards at the lab disintegrate right under the noses of the state Department of Public Health?

The public would have a greater comfort level if such questions were addressed by an independent investigator. Among the names being tossed about are former federal prosecutor Wayne Budd and former Superior Court justice Suzanne Del Vecchio. No matter what, the bar association sees this as a job for a trusted outsider. So should the public.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.