You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

editorial

Time to drop ban on blood donations by gay men

The safety of the nation’s blood banks should be the paramount concern for public-health officials, not the feelings of potential donors. But in the case of the 30-year-old ban on gay men donating blood, based on ’80s-vintage fears of HIV/AIDS contamination, science has superseded the rules. A one-year waiting period on donations after any male-to-male sexual encounter should be sufficient protection, and senators, including Elizabeth Warren, are right to push for a rule change. The current law deprives blood banks of donors, and perpetuates an increasingly outmoded perception that HIV/AIDS is only transmitted through the gay community.

An outright ban on blood donations by any man who had engaged in same-sex intercourse may have been justified at the dawn of the epidemic, when there was no sure way to detect the virus and the gay community was at its epicenter. But by 2006, awareness, prevention, and, most importantly, the speed and accuracy of modern screening spurred the Red Cross, the American Association of Blood Banks, and America’s Blood Centers to jointly ask the Department of Health and Human Services to soften the rules to a one-year waiting period.

Continue reading below

In 2010, then-senator John Kerry joined that call, saying the ban created “medically unjustified double standards.” He noted that a man who has sex with a prostitute or a woman who has sex with a man who is HIV positive face only a 12-month “deferral” period before they can donate blood. The issue heated up again this summer with a call from the American Medical Association to replace the ban with “rational, scientifically based” policies. Last week, in response to a letter from a gay man from Roslindale whose blood donation was rejected after the Boston Marathon bombings, Warren co-wrote a letter with four other members of Congress asking HHS to speed up its review of blood-donation guidelines and end “this outdated policy.”

HHS should do just that.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.