You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

The Boston Globe



Eric Holder wisely splits the difference

Washington and Colorado voters created a quandary for the US Justice Department last fall when they chose to legalize recreational marijuana. While the drug is still banned under federal law, marijuana-related offenses generally are addressed under state laws. Wisely, the Department of Justice announced late last month that it won’t sue states to block their legalization measures — and will instead take a more limited role of keeping marijuana from crossing state borders or into federal land, and from getting into the hands of children.

This approach will help remove the uncertainty about the legal status of marijuana vendors, who would otherwise be subject to raids by federal agents. When state law winks at or explicitly allows marijuana, residents will surely feel less inhibited about using it. But if there is no legal supply, those users are bound to turn to illegal sources. Allowing legal vendors to operate should take money out of the pockets of dangerous traffickers while accepting the judgment of Washington and Colorado voters.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week