Science can impose its own oppressive orthodoxy

In his review of Richard Dawkins’s “An Appetite for Wonder: The Making of a Scientist” (g, Sept. 30) Eric Liebetrau quotes Dawkins as saying, “I can’t help wondering whether a diet of fairy stories filled with magic spells and miracles . . . is educationally harmful.”

Although I write as a Christian, I believe that I am one with my Jewish and Islamic brethren and, indeed, with many agnostics and atheists as well in affirming that a narrative doesn’t have to be literal and historical to contain truth.


Is it possible that Dawkins has turned science into a philosophy — an educational philosophy that restricts the literature that children should be permitted to read — or even, heaven forbid, into a religion?

John Harutunian


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com