Letters

letters

Science can impose its own oppressive orthodoxy

In his review of Richard Dawkins’s “An Appetite for Wonder: The Making of a Scientist” (g, Sept. 30) Eric Liebetrau quotes Dawkins as saying, “I can’t help wondering whether a diet of fairy stories filled with magic spells and miracles . . . is educationally harmful.”

Although I write as a Christian, I believe that I am one with my Jewish and Islamic brethren and, indeed, with many agnostics and atheists as well in affirming that a narrative doesn’t have to be literal and historical to contain truth.

Advertisement

Is it possible that Dawkins has turned science into a philosophy — an educational philosophy that restricts the literature that children should be permitted to read — or even, heaven forbid, into a religion?

John Harutunian

Newtonville

Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com