You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.


An objection is raised to Obama’s take on international law

President Obama’s statement last week that the proposed referendum in the Crimea on reuniting with Russia would “violate international law” is simply wrong. As the International Court of Justice made clear in its 2010 opinion on the declaration of independence by the authorities in Kosovo — at the time recognized by all as a part of Serbia — international law neither authorizes nor prohibits such political statements, and the same analysis surely applies to the referendum.

This fact does not justify the Russian invasion of Crimea, but it does highlight the many parallels between the role of outsiders in Crimea and Kosovo.

Continue reading below

That’s the trouble with law, at least in principle: It applies to everyone equally.

Hurst Hannum


The writer is a professor of international law at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of