You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.


Our private thoughts are not a reality show for anyone to tune into

Jeff Jacoby’s column “Sterling’s words vulgar, but private” (Op-ed, April 30) touched upon the essence of society’s dilemma, pitting individual privacy in the 21st century against the public’s appetite for “private thoughts.”

For ages, people have been trying to probe the private thoughts of others, whether they be the betrothed wondering if their intended truly loves them, or the police dancing around the concept of Miranda v. Arizona in an attempt to exact a confession from the private thoughts of the accused.

Continue reading below

Jacoby writes, “Private lives and private thoughts aren’t supposed to be everyone’s business.” I agree.

Our private thoughts are not a reality show for anyone to tune into, but rather a sanctuary into which human beings can retreat to sort things out and decide for themselves what stays in and what goes out.

Think of the damage the world would suffer without the buffer zone of impenetrable private thoughts. World diplomacy would fail, marriages and relationships would be torn asunder, and mankind would not evolve but devolve.

Do we really want to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

Harris Jordan


Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of