You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

The Boston Globe



In upholding pollution rules, Supreme Court sides with common sense

The Supreme Court’s decision on Tuesday upholding new clean air regulations has been hailed as a victory for environmentalists. And that it is; the 6-2 ruling allows important new restrictions to take effect, which will likely lead to the phasing out of some old coal plants and pave the way for further regulation. Importantly, though, the ruling by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was also a refreshing blow for common sense — in the face of nit-picking, polluter-friendly legal theories that would render much-needed environmental rules all but unenforceable.

The case stems from the federal Clean Air Act’s “good neighbor” provision, which allows the EPA to regulate pollution that is emitted in one state but wafts into another. That provision is especially important for the Northeast, where wind patterns blow much of the nation’s air pollution. In one especially dramatic example, 93 percent of the ozone pollution in New Haven came from outside Connecticut. According to the EPA, no fewer than 28 states contributed to the city’s pollution.

Loading comments...

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week