You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on BostonGlobe.com. Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

editorial

Disclosure bill for super PACs: Voters need to know

State Senator Jamie Eldridge of Acton sponsored a bill for campaign finance reform.

Erik Jacobs for The Boston Globe/file 2007

State Senator Jamie Eldridge of Acton sponsored a bill for campaign finance reform.

Money talks in politics, and voters should always know who’s doing the talking and who’s paying for it. That’s the overall mission behind a campaign finance proposal sponsored by state Senator Jamie Eldridge of Acton and backed by Common Cause of Massachusetts. The bill, which passed the House last month, would require super PACs — committees that can spend unlimited amounts of money on independent political advertising and campaign activity — to regularly report how much money they spend supporting specific candidates. At the last minute, as the Senate Ways and Means Committee considered the measure, the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the state’s largest union, tried to weaken it by targeting a provision requiring political action committees to disclose the top five donors behind their television ads. (The committee is expected to report out a bill Monday.)

The attempt to undermine this provision shows exactly why it and the overall bill are both needed. Influential corporations and labor unions like the option of anonymously underwriting political campaign activities. But voters have a greater interest in knowing where the money spent supporting a candidate is coming from and how much it might influence future votes and decisions.

Continue reading below

More money than ever is pouring into campaign coffers, ever since the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision to eliminate all fund-raising restrictions for independent political groups. The Citizens United v. FEC ruling and subsequent decisions allow unions and corporations to raise unlimited sums of money and spend them to support candidates, as long as they don’t coordinate directly with the candidate.

Unlike individual candidates, political associations, unions, and corporations can easily get around the existing disclosure requirements for their spending. In Massachusetts, this campaign finance bill would peel back the curtain on such spending and at least let voters know the source of a candidate’s money. Lawmakers shouldn’t let the MTA or any other group thwart that goal.

Loading comments...
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Already a subscriber?
Your city. Your stories. Your Globe.
Yours FREE for two weeks.
Enjoy free unlimited access to Globe.com for the next two weeks.
Limited time only - No credit card required!
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.
Thanks & Welcome to Globe.com
You now have unlimited access for the next two weeks.
BostonGlobe.com complimentary digital access has been provided to you, without a subscription, for free starting today and ending in 14 days. After the free trial period, your free BostonGlobe.com digital access will stop immediately unless you sign up for BostonGlobe.com digital subscription. Current print and digital subscribers are not eligible for the free trial.