Letters

letters | Commonwealth Avenue

Motorists’ needs should not be driving force in plan for Commonwealth Ave.

Michael Berger spoke with Amy Ingles, a volunteer with LivableStreets Alliance, who was gathering signatures on Commonwealth Avenue in opposition to the city’s plans for the heavily traveled thoroughfare.
Josh Reynolds for The Boston Globe
Michael Berger spoke with Amy Ingles, a volunteer with LivableStreets Alliance, who was gathering signatures on Commonwealth Avenue in opposition to the city’s plans for the heavily traveled thoroughfare.

Re “Bicyclists see missed opportunity in Commonwealth Ave. overhaul” (Page A1, Aug. 2): James Gillooly, Boston transportation commissioner, talks a good game about planning for all users on Commonwealth Avenue, but when it comes down to it, he lets on that it all comes back to accommodating cars ahead of other users.

Martine Powers writes that Gillooly said that “lanes need to be wide enough to allow buses to pull over to pick up and let off passengers without blocking multiple lanes of car traffic.”

This is wrongheaded.

Advertisement

While it is important for pedestrians and bicycle advocates to remember that transit is an important user on Comm. Ave., what is the problem with a bus blocking a car travel lane? A few seconds of time for a few motorists should not come at the expense of tens of thousands of bus riders, pedestrians, and cyclists. Let’s plan for them, and if it results in a blocked travel lane, so be it.

Get Arguable with Jeff Jacoby in your inbox:
From the Globe's must-read columnist, an extra offering each week of opinion and ideas.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Cars are but a fraction of the traffic on Comm. Ave. In planning, they should be the last users considered, not the first.

Ari Ofsevit

Cambridge