You can now read 10 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.

The Boston Globe



Development process poses serious health concerns

JOHN E. Sununu (“Natural gas isn’t PC, but it’s the future,’’ Op-ed, Oct. 24) is wrong about where we should seek the future of energy. Climate scientists oppose further development of coal and tar sands for good reasons. However, fracking shale gas, or hydraulic fracturing, leads to health effects that stem from breathing air and drinking groundwater contaminated by the toxic stew of chemicals used to release shale gas, well known to ranchers in the West for more than two decades.

Fracking shale gas now threatens tens of millions who depend on the Delaware River watershed. The shale gas industry refuses to divulge the chemicals used in fracking, and the documented degradation of land, water resources, and human health that results is nothing less than an egregious violation of human rights.

Continue reading below

The United States is desperate for an energy policy that does not feature shale gas, coal, or tar sands as an alternative to dwindling petroleum reserves.

P.T. Davis

E.A. Oches

D.W. Szymanski


The writers are geology professors at Bentley University.

You have reached the limit of 10 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week