In District 3 council race, you could have opted for no endorsement

IT’S A sad day when the choice for city councilor is between two candidates with legal issues, one past and the other current (“For District 3: John O’Toole,’’ Editorial, Nov. 1). I don’t think Boston should have to settle for either John O’Toole, who failed to pay $22,000 in income taxes, or Frank Baker, who pleaded guilty to marijuana possession in 1993. It would have been courageous for the Globe to decline any endorsement. Instead, we see the Globe opting to endorse a candidate who is delinquent on taxes. A candidate’s first responsibility should be to handle his own financial issues, and once those are in order, he can focus on community issues. We’ve seen what can happen when it is otherwise.

Kathleen C. Stone

Your comment is subject to the rules of our Posting Policy

This comment may appear on your public profile. Public Profile FAQ

We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com