NRC’s word on safety of nuclear plants doesn’t make her feel safe

YOUR STORY “Duxbury resident still fighting Pilgrim’’ (Metro, March 11) reports that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission inspected all US reactors after the Fukushima accident and concluded that they are safe. “At the same time, we are pursuing multiple changes that could make plants safer,’’ adds NRC spokesman Neil Sheehan.

Isn’t there a big contradiction here? On the one hand, we’re reassured that nuclear plants are safe, while on the other we’re told the agency is working to make them safer. They’re safe but need to be made safer? This sounds to me like an admission that they’re not safe.


Mary Lampert of Duxbury is right in saying that “what happened in Japan could happen here, and we shouldn’t have to take that risk.’’

Joan Holt


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
You're reading  1 of 5 free articles.
Get UNLIMITED access for only 99¢ per week Subscribe Now >
You're reading1 of 5 free articles.Keep scrolling to see more articles recomended for you Subscribe now
We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com