A bystander to the debate over health care

Hardly a day goes by without a Globe editorial, op-ed, or article reminding us of the so-called critical stakes that are up for grabs in the current health insurance debate. But is this really true? When I think about matters that are critical for me, I am most always thinking about the physical and mental health of my family, their current state of happiness in life, their financial well-being, the progress they are making in school, and other issues of this type.

The current debate over health insurance fundamentally revolves around the question of how health care will be provided for people who cannot afford to pay for it. Like most Americans who are not poor, I simply assume that, one way or another, I will end up paying for my own care, leaving the politicians and lobbyists currently in charge free to add ­— without any input from me — a still-to-be-determined something-or-other to the bill for themselves and the health care of nonpayers.

Your comment is subject to the rules of our Posting Policy

This comment may appear on your public profile. Public Profile FAQ

We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com