Letters

letters | THE SENATE CANDIDATES’ TAX RETURNS

Crunching the data on candidates’ charitable giving

US SENATOR SCOTT BROWN AND DEMOCRAT ELIZABETH WARREN
STEVEN SENNE/ASSOCIATED PRESS
US SENATOR SCOTT BROWN AND DEMOCRAT ELIZABETH WARREN

I read the article “From humble roots to top of income ladder: Warren, Brown release tax returns” (Page A1, April 28) with great interest. As a former engineer and current high school math teacher, I often use various data to augment my opinions on political issues. You write that Elizabeth Warren and her husband’s joint income averaged about $850,000 over four years, and Scott Brown and his wife’s income averaged about $428,000 over the same period.

I determined the percentages of their income that went to charitable contributions during the four years: about 2.8 percent for Warren and about 2.1 percent for Brown. Neither is impressive to me.

Checking my returns for the same four years, I determined that we had charitable contributions of about 4.6 percent on an average joint income of less than $100,000.

Advertisement

While I have certain opinions regarding what needs to be done for overall tax reform, I find the current rhetoric regarding what is a “fair” tax rate for the top 1 percent in this country to be silly outside the topic of overall tax reform, and hypocritical when some of our elected officials and candidates who are 1 percenters don’t donate what I would consider a fair or reasonable amount of their income to charity.

Get Arguable with Jeff Jacoby in your inbox:
From the Globe's must-read columnist, an extra offering each week of opinion and ideas.
Thank you for signing up! Sign up for more newsletters here

Actions speak louder to me than political rhetoric.

David Bernardi

Scituate