Letters | issue is not cat etiquette, but safety

Outdoors are no place for these animals

Wow, what an ignorant editorial on the cat leash proposal in Concord (“Cats: If you like it, put a bell on it,” May 3). Concern for songbirds drove Lydia Lodnysky’s proposal that the town of Concord adopt rules about cat ownership. But her proposal was doomed because people’s view of cats is outdated.

Cats are supposedly so independent that no laws should apply to their ownership. Let them roam freely, so that they can get mangled by a car, coyote, dog, insane person — by all means, allow them to be the innately wild creatures that they are. Imagine if people in cities and everywhere else could just let their dogs go outside to wander, poop, and intimidate people. That’s how it was a generation ago. Likewise, the presumption that cats cannot be content without going outside needs a revamp.

Your comment is subject to the rules of our Posting Policy

This comment may appear on your public profile. Public Profile FAQ

We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com