Consumer choice must factor into easing health costs

The May 9 edition of the Globe included an article on the State House debate on health care payment reform (“2 Mass. plans vie for savings on health care,” Page A1) and a column by Derrick Z. Jackson on obesity and health care costs (“Obesity, the new cigarette,” Op-ed). Providers were the primary target in the payment reform article; the food industry the target in the column about obesity. What is missing in both debates is a mention of personal responsibility and the role of the consumer in controlling skyrocketing costs.

Unlike other forms of insurance, such as auto insurance, health insurance contains no semblance of experience rating or consumer financial incentives for doing the right thing. If we really want to control health care costs, we need to reform the insurance marketplace to create true financial incentives in the form of future premium reductions for proper behavior, including using low-cost providers, quitting smoking, losing weight, and engaging in wellness programs.


We should all be willing to share the health care costs of someone else that come about as a result of bad luck; we should not have to cover as many avoidable costs as we do today that are brought about by bad behavior.

Jon B. Hurst


Retailers Association

of Massachusetts


Loading comments...
Real journalists. Real journalism. Subscribe to The Boston Globe today.
We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com