Get unlimited access to Bruins cup coverage - Just 99¢

The Boston Globe

Letters

letters

Time to get beyond procreation as sole determinant of marriage

Dana Stone Denise: John Clark calls gay marriage a distraction from the purpose of being wed, which he says is procreation. Perhaps we should just invalidate the marriages of infertile couples because, after all, they have no children. And if one marries only to procreate, why do people enter into second marriages well after their childbearing years have ended? Procreation is one of several different reasons to marry, and should not be used as a defining factor or prerequisite.

Are you a home delivery subscriber?

Get FREE access as part of your print subscription

Start Here

Contact us for help

  • Phone

    888-MY-GLOBE

    Monday-Friday 6:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m.

    Saturday, Sunday and Holidays 7:30 a.m.- 12:00 noon

  • Chat

    Start a chat

    Monday-Sunday 8:00 a.m.- 5:00 p.m.

  • E-mail

    support@bostonglobe.com

Your comment is subject to the rules of our Posting Policy

This comment may appear on your public profile. Public Profile FAQ