Time to get beyond procreation as sole determinant of marriage

In the May 11 letter “Mother and father bringing new life into world is basis of marriage,” John Clark calls gay marriage a distraction from the purpose of being wed, which he says is procreation. Would he also consider a childless heterosexual marriage such a distraction, and would he deny them rights as well? Perhaps we should just invalidate the marriages of infertile couples because, after all, they have no children. And if one marries only to procreate, why do people enter into second marriages well after their childbearing years have ended?

Procreation is one of several different reasons to marry, and should not be used as a defining factor or prerequisite. I married my husband because I wanted to share my life with him; our children are a bonus we did not initially plan for.

Your comment is subject to the rules of our Posting Policy

This comment may appear on your public profile. Public Profile FAQ

We hope you've enjoyed your free articles.
Continue reading by subscribing to Globe.com for just 99¢.
 Already a member? Log in Home
Subscriber Log In

We hope you've enjoyed your 5 free articles'

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com
Marketing image of BostonGlobe.com