You can now read 5 articles in a month for free on Read as much as you want anywhere and anytime for just 99¢.


Closed-door decision-making undoes democratic process

Thank you for your fine June 4 editorial “Beacon Hill leaders stifle debate among legislators.” It’s depressing to see how the democratic process has ground to a virtual standstill here in Massachusetts, the cradle of American democracy. Many public-spirited citizens give up when they realize that their input no longer makes any difference.

As you write, the decisions are being made behind closed doors. Those making the decisions are often more responsive to monied interests than the general public. The proposed update of the popular bottle bill, which has been bottled up in committee for years, is a prime example of this.

Continue reading below

The Legislature’s trend toward closed-door decision-making is in the vein of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, and it underscores the need to make politics about ideas instead of influence, and to restore power to the voting public.

Isn’t that the point of what happened here in 1776?

Paul Lauenstein


Loading comments...
Want each day's news headlines delivered fresh to your
inbox every morning? Just connect with us
in one of the following ways:
Please enter a valid email will never post anything without asking.
Privacy Policy
Subscriber Log In

You have reached the limit of 5 free articles in a month

Stay informed with unlimited access to Boston’s trusted news source.

  • High-quality journalism from the region’s largest newsroom
  • Convenient access across all of your devices
  • Today’s Headlines daily newsletter
  • Subscriber-only access to exclusive offers, events, contests, eBooks, and more
  • Less than 25¢ a week
Marketing image of
Marketing image of